Avoid the following:
./msgaccel-prepare -S"dir" file
Unknown option: Sdir
So "dir" is no longer interpreted as an argument to "-S". This
was apparently introduced in Getopt::Long version 2.48.
po/README suggests running the po/gen_translations_stats.sh script,
and it has a #! line, so it should be executable.
(cherry picked from elinks-0.12 commit 70ef4c8fdd)
Remove the Language-Team header; Zas is a person, not a team.
Copyright licence was given in email:
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:49:16 +0200
From: Mikael Berthe <mikael.berthe@lilotux.net>
To: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@iki.fi>
Cc: Laurent Monin <i18n@norz.org>
Subject: Re: [ELinks] French translation update
Message-ID: <20090602074916.GX5189@lilotux.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:30:50 +0200
From: Mikael Berthe <mikael.berthe@lilotux.net>
To: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [ELinks] French translation update
Message-ID: <20090602083050.GY5189@lilotux.net>
Make it clear that modified versions may also be distributed.
I am the sole copyright holder for these ELinks files
so I can replace the licence like this.
This version of the licence is used in bind-9.5.0-P2.tar.gz.
Wikipedia claims ISC made the change in July 2007 after a request
from the FSF.
Conflicts:
NEWS
configure.in
The following files also conflicted, but they had not been manually
edited in the elinks-0.12 branch after the previous merge, so I just
kept the 0.13.GIT versions:
doc/man/man1/elinks.1.in
doc/man/man5/elinks.conf.5
doc/man/man5/elinkskeys.5
po/fr.po
po/pl.po
It is not necessary: when a rule has multiple commands in it, GNU Make
(which ELinks requires anyway) runs them one at a time, regardless of
the -j option, and skips the remaining commands when one of them
fails, regardless of the -k option. These options take effect at the
level of targets rather than individual commands.
http://elinks.cz/community.html says bugs should be reported
to elinks-users but patches should be sent to elinks-dev.
I guess elinks-users is more appropriate here.
This is so that contrib/mkdist need not delete that explicitly
(although it still does, in order to do the right thing with
a few older versions too).
The file could apparently be removed altogether (see recent
emails on elinks-dev) but a small change like this is less
likely to cause any surprises.
