The previous code just printed time_t directly with "%ld". Now it
instead first casts to time_print_T (currently long) and then formats
with TIME_PRINT_FORMAT (currently "ld"). So the varargs will now
always match with the format string, even if time_t is longer than
long. This still doesn't correctly format time_t values larger than
LONG_MAX, though. But now it is at least easier to find some of the
places that need to be changed to support that.
I located these time_t-to-string conversions by searching for
str_to_time_t, expires, and last_visit. There are still more places
that assume every interesting time_t value fits either in 32 bits or
in a long, e.g. in the cookie editor and in the ECMAScript interface.
Inspired by bug 6.
Document what happens if goto_url_hook or follow_url_hook returns None or "".
doc/events.txt already explains the corresponding C values.
[ commit message by me --KON ]
* Recompute the pos variable for each cell, rather than just once per line.
This fixes the bug that only the first cell was being examined.
* Moved the bulk of the code outside the "if (frame && data >= 176 &&
data < 224)" conditional. This fixes the bug that only frame
characters were being added to the string.
* If the cell has UCS_NO_CHAR in it, don't add that to the string.
* Call encode_utf8 even for characters that originated from a frame.
This does not matter yet but will be correct if the function is
later changed to use the Unicode line-drawing characters for frames.
In the elinks.conf.5 manual page, the text below the list of modes was
getting included in the last list item. This appears to be a design
error in AsciiDoc. Work around it by moving the text above the list.
elinks.1.in, elinkskeys.5, and elinks.conf.5 are included in the Git tree,
so they are initially in the srcdir, and that's were the new versions must go.
This ensures that no other string can have the same address. It
probably never was a problem though, because the strings to which it
can be compared either are allocated from the heap or are in
strings[][] which already has unshared storage.
On Dec 31, 2006, at 11:30am, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo writes:
>src/scripting/python/hooks.c (script_hook_url) calls hooks as
>goto_url_hook(new-url, current-url) and follow_url_hook(new-url).
>It has a comment saying that the current-url parameter exists
>only for compatibility and that the script can instead use
>elinks.current_url(). However, the current-url parameter was
>added in commit 87e27b9b3e and is
>not in ELinks 0.11.2, so any compatibility problems would only
>hit people who have been using 0.12.GIT snapshots. Can we remove
>the second parameter now before releasing ELinks 0.12pre1?
The decision isn't up to me, but I think this is a good idea. Here's a
patch that would update the documentation and hooks.py, as well as hooks.c.
FYI, if this patch is applied then anyone who's still trying to use a
goto_url_hook that expects a second argument will get a "Browser scripting
error" dialog box that says:
An error occurred while running a Python script:
TypeError: goto_url_hook() takes exactly 2 arguments (1 given)
