3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Thomas Levine
56a4e5d8af introduction paragraph 2016-01-25 14:06:33 +00:00
Thomas Levine
d81b7efdc3 asciibetical 2016-01-25 13:56:33 +00:00
Thomas Levine
7f5455739d update readme
* move shall reference to the right place
* further explain cross-shell testing methods
2016-01-25 13:49:36 +00:00

View File

@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
/ /_/ / / / /__/ / / / / / / /
\__,_/_/ \___/_/ /_/_/_/ /_/
Urchin is a test framework for shell. It is implemented in
portable /bin/sh and should work on GNU/Linux, Mac OS X, and
other Unix platforms.
Urchin is a file-based test harness, normally used for testing shell programs.
It is written in portable shell and should thus work on GNU/Linux, BSD
(including Mac OS X), and other Unix-like platforms.
## Try it out
Urchin's tests are written in Urchin, so you can run them to see what Urchin
@@ -27,14 +27,15 @@ run this:
cd urchin
./cross-shell-tests
## Globally
Download Urchin like so (as root) (or use npm, below):
## Install
Urchin is contained in a single file, so you can install it by copying it to a
directory in your `PATH`. For example, you can run the following as root.
cd /usr/local/bin
wget https://raw.github.com/tlevine/urchin/master/urchin
chmod +x urchin
Can be installed with npm too:
Urchin can be installed with npm too.
npm install -g urchin
@@ -86,15 +87,14 @@ Files are only run if they are executable, and files beginning with `.` are
ignored. Thus, fixtures and libraries can be included sloppily within the test
directory tree. The test passes if the file exits 0; otherwise, it fails.
In case you care about the order in which your tests execute, consider that
Tests files and subdirectories are run in ASCIIbetical order within each
directory; that is,
urchin looks for files within a directory in the following manner.
for file in *; do
do_something_with_test_file $file
done
Tests within a directory are executed in whatever order `*` returns.
### Writing cross-shell compatibility tests for testing shell code
While you could write your test scripts to explicitly invoke the functionality
@@ -106,24 +106,20 @@ The specific approach depends on your test scenario:
* (b) Your scripts _source_ scripts containing portable shell code.
#### (a) Cross-shell tests with test scripts that _invoke_ shell scripts
Urchin sets the `TEST_SHELL` environment variable so that you may change the
shell with which your tests call other shell programs. To run your test
scripts in multiple shells you must call `$TEST_SHELL` in your tests and then
run urchin with the appropriate option.
First, consider using [shall](https://github.com/mklement0/shall).
#!/usr/bin/env shall
echo This is a test file.
Alternatively, you can use urchin's built-in recognition of the
`TEST_SHELL` environment variable.
In your test scripts, invoke the shell scripts to test via the shell
specified in environment variable `TEST_SHELL` rather than directly;
e.g.: `$TEST_SHELL ../foo bar` (rather than just `../foo bar`).
Note that if you alsow want your test scripts to work when run directly,
outside of Urchin, be sure to target scripts that happen to be in the
current directory with prefix `./`; e.g., `$TEST_SHELL ./baz`
(rather than `$TEST_SHELL baz`).
Then, on invocation of Urchin, prepend a definition of environment variable
`TEST_SHELL` specifying the shell to test with, e.g.: `TEST_SHELL=zsh urchin ./tests`.
On invocation of Urchin, prepend a definition of environment variable
`TEST_SHELL` specifying the shell to test with, e.g.,
TEST_SHELL=zsh urchin ./tests
To test with multiple shells in sequence, use something like:
for shell in sh bash ksh zsh; do
@@ -131,14 +127,20 @@ To test with multiple shells in sequence, use something like:
done
If `TEST_SHELL` has no value, Urchin defines it as `/bin/sh`, so the test
scripts can rely on `$TEST_SHELL` always containing a value.
scripts can rely on `$TEST_SHELL` always containing a value when Urchin runs
them.
That said, we still recommand that you account for the possibility that
`$TEST_SHELL` does not contain a value so that you may run your test scripts
without Urchin. Supporting this case is very simple; when you invoke scripts
that happen to be in the current directory, be sure to use the prefix `./`,
e.g., `$TEST_SHELL ./baz` rather than `$TEST_SHELL baz`.
#### (b) Cross-shell tests with test scripts that _source_ shell scripts
If you _source_ shell code in your test scripts, it is the test scripts
themselves that must be run with the shell specified.
To that end, Urchin supports the `-s <shell>` option, which instructs
Urchin supports the `-s <shell>` option, which instructs
Urchin to invoke the test scripts with the specified shell; e.g., `-s bash`.
(In addition, Urchin sets environment variable `TEST_SHELL` to the specified
shell.)
@@ -154,21 +156,12 @@ To test with multiple shells in sequence, use something like:
urchin -s $shell ./tests
done
<!--
#### (c) Cross shell tests with `urchin -x` (experimental)
If you run urchin with the `-x` flag, it will be as if you ran
`$TEST_SHELL`. Unless `$TEST_SHELL` isn't set, in which case it'll
be as if you ran `/bin/sh`. Putting this in she shebang line might
eventually work out to be a cleaner way of doing cross-shell testing.
Also consider using [shall](https://github.com/mklement0/shall).
It does something similar, but the interface may be more intuitive.
#!/usr/bin/env urchin -x
test a = a
#!/usr/bin/env shall
echo This is a test file.
It might make sense if you do this.
export TEST_SHELL=zsh && urchin -x
export TEST_SHELL=bash && urchin -x
-->
## Alternatives to Urchin
Alternatives to Urchin are discussed in
[this blog post](https://blog.scraperwiki.com/2012/12/how-to-test-shell-scripts/).