update readme

* move shall reference to the right place
* further explain cross-shell testing methods
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Levine 2016-01-25 13:49:35 +00:00
parent 48e5090091
commit 7f5455739d
1 changed files with 22 additions and 29 deletions

View File

@ -106,24 +106,20 @@ The specific approach depends on your test scenario:
* (b) Your scripts _source_ scripts containing portable shell code.
#### (a) Cross-shell tests with test scripts that _invoke_ shell scripts
Urchin sets the `TEST_SHELL` environment variable so that you may change the
shell with which your tests call other shell programs. To run your test
scripts in multiple shells you must call `$TEST_SHELL` in your tests and then
run urchin with the appropriate option.
First, consider using [shall](https://github.com/mklement0/shall).
#!/usr/bin/env shall
echo This is a test file.
Alternatively, you can use urchin's built-in recognition of the
`TEST_SHELL` environment variable.
In your test scripts, invoke the shell scripts to test via the shell
specified in environment variable `TEST_SHELL` rather than directly;
e.g.: `$TEST_SHELL ../foo bar` (rather than just `../foo bar`).
Note that if you alsow want your test scripts to work when run directly,
outside of Urchin, be sure to target scripts that happen to be in the
current directory with prefix `./`; e.g., `$TEST_SHELL ./baz`
(rather than `$TEST_SHELL baz`).
Then, on invocation of Urchin, prepend a definition of environment variable
`TEST_SHELL` specifying the shell to test with, e.g.: `TEST_SHELL=zsh urchin ./tests`.
On invocation of Urchin, prepend a definition of environment variable
`TEST_SHELL` specifying the shell to test with, e.g.,
TEST_SHELL=zsh urchin ./tests
To test with multiple shells in sequence, use something like:
for shell in sh bash ksh zsh; do
@ -131,14 +127,20 @@ To test with multiple shells in sequence, use something like:
done
If `TEST_SHELL` has no value, Urchin defines it as `/bin/sh`, so the test
scripts can rely on `$TEST_SHELL` always containing a value.
scripts can rely on `$TEST_SHELL` always containing a value when Urchin runs
them.
That said, we still recommand that you account for the possibility that
`$TEST_SHELL` does not contain a value so that you may run your test scripts
without Urchin. Supporting this case is very simple; when you invoke scripts
that happen to be in the current directory, be sure to use the prefix `./`,
e.g., `$TEST_SHELL ./baz` rather than `$TEST_SHELL baz`.
#### (b) Cross-shell tests with test scripts that _source_ shell scripts
If you _source_ shell code in your test scripts, it is the test scripts
themselves that must be run with the shell specified.
To that end, Urchin supports the `-s <shell>` option, which instructs
Urchin supports the `-s <shell>` option, which instructs
Urchin to invoke the test scripts with the specified shell; e.g., `-s bash`.
(In addition, Urchin sets environment variable `TEST_SHELL` to the specified
shell.)
@ -154,21 +156,12 @@ To test with multiple shells in sequence, use something like:
urchin -s $shell ./tests
done
<!--
#### (c) Cross shell tests with `urchin -x` (experimental)
If you run urchin with the `-x` flag, it will be as if you ran
`$TEST_SHELL`. Unless `$TEST_SHELL` isn't set, in which case it'll
be as if you ran `/bin/sh`. Putting this in she shebang line might
eventually work out to be a cleaner way of doing cross-shell testing.
Also consider using [shall](https://github.com/mklement0/shall).
It does something similar, but the interface may be more intuitive.
#!/usr/bin/env urchin -x
test a = a
#!/usr/bin/env shall
echo This is a test file.
It might make sense if you do this.
export TEST_SHELL=zsh && urchin -x
export TEST_SHELL=bash && urchin -x
-->
## Alternatives to Urchin
Alternatives to Urchin are discussed in
[this blog post](https://blog.scraperwiki.com/2012/12/how-to-test-shell-scripts/).