`data_dir` would have been leaked if directory creation failed.
`editor_argv` was leaked at some point, no idea why.
```
==1244734== 118 (32 direct, 86 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6,299 of 7,824
==1244734== at 0x4846CC3: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1451)
==1244734== by 0x5E85AD0: g_realloc (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.1)
==1244734== by 0x5E4A004: ??? (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.1)
==1244734== by 0x5E4A7B1: g_ptr_array_add (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.1)
==1244734== by 0x5EA4235: g_strsplit (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.1)
==1244734== by 0x1F143C: get_message_from_editor (editor.c:92)
==1244734== by 0x193F6B: _inp_rl_send_to_editor (inputwin.c:950)
==1244734== by 0x614642F: _rl_dispatch_subseq (readline.c:916)
==1244734== by 0x6146C85: _rl_dispatch_callback (readline.c:823)
==1244734== by 0x616739F: rl_callback_read_char (callback.c:241)
==1244734== by 0x1923DB: inp_readline (inputwin.c:188)
==1244734== by 0x149860: prof_run (profanity.c:117)
==1244734== by 0x2283E8: main (main.c:186)
```
Signed-off-by: Steffen Jaeckel <jaeckel-floss@eyet-services.de>
There were multiple reports where after a reconnect the window of the
MUC that was last opened, was empty.
`muc_join()` creates an instance of a MUC, `presence_join_room()` works
with this instance. Therefore the instance has to exist before working on
it.
I'm not sure if this really fixes the issue, but at least it didn't
happen anymore after I applied this modification.
I can't remember how I stumbled over this, either while looking at debug
logs or while looking at Valgrind output while a reconnect happened, but
something went wrong. Then I came to the conclusion that this may fix
the issue and for now it did ... maybe it comes back, then my RCA was
wrong.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Jaeckel <jaeckel-floss@eyet-services.de>
Each of the cmd_executable_editor(), cmd_executable_urlopen() etc calls
this helper function since they were all doing the same just for
different configurations.
This is done in `/executable avatar set` since d7848e38b.
The command help also didn't mention this anymore.
Seems like it was forgotten to remove the actual parsing of this.
Add "/avatar disable" to comply with point "3.5 Publisher Disables
Avatar Publishing" in XEP-0084.
src/command/cmd_defs.c:2416
Add "disable" argument. Reword the "/avatar" command description
so it flows better.
src/command/cmd_ac.c:1101
Add "disable" to the "/avatar" autocomplete dictionary.
src/command/cmd_funcs.c:9277
Split "/avatar" commands into two groups with an if statement; those
with a parameter and those without. "cons_bad_cmd_usage()" is in both
groups, which is messy. "disable" has similar logic to "set", but it
includes a failure message.
src/xmpp/avatar.c:152
"avatar_publishing_disable()" uses the same logic to publish metadata
as in "avatar_set()".
src/xmpp/avatar.c:238
Add a message to inform users when they do not receive an avatar after
using "/avatar get" and "/avatar open". In case of a failure, the user
will be subscribed to future avatar updates as long as they continue
to use their current instance of profanity. Adding
"caps_remove_feature()" after "cons_show()" will unsubscribe the user
from avatar updates and prevent the user from downloading an avatar
unexpectedly hours later without issuing an "/avatar" command.
src/xmpp/stanza.c:2698
The new "disable" function follows the same logic as
"stanza_create_avatar_metadata_publish_iq()".
Before it tried to unload the plugin first and check the output.
But if broken plugin was loaded, then it couldn't unload it,
so before it require uninstall and install after it,
making update useless for plugin development purposes.
Unload is part of the uninstall so no unload is needed inside of the cmd function.
Refactoring of cmd_plugins_update.
Introduce new feature: sessions_alarm.
Added new account setting: max_connections. On exceeding this number,
user will get an alert. If number is less than 1, no alert will happen.
Tests altered to fit new feature.
Expected behaviour
When you type
/command
/command
it should be just 1 entry in the history.
Behaviour
All the entries were saved.
Behaviour is changed by introducing check. Before adding to history,
entry now is compared to the last history entry.
Let's just define some basic terminology.
In many sections of the /help we actually use these terms.
This should help new users understand what they mean.
The goal should be that users can make a more informed decision about
which encryption they actually want to use.
We can also use this to document usage details of implementation quirks,
if any.
