The long term goal is good looking of the Python docs in ELinks, especially
background colors. Every start tag and every text node would have associated
a natural number. Those numbers would be "drawn" in the document instead
of colors. Finally, the screen driver would change numbers into colors.
This will be done in small steps. The next step is to implement this change
in the screen driver.
C99 6.7.4p3 and 6.7.4p6 set some constraints on what can be done in
inline functions and how they can be declared. In particular, any
function declared inline must also be defined in the same translation
unit. To comply with that, remove inline specifiers from function
declarations in header files when the functions are not also defined
in those header files.
Sun Studio 11 on Solaris 9 is stricter than C99 and does not allow
references to static identifiers in extern inline functions. Make the
configure script detect this and define NONSTATIC_INLINE accordingly
in config.h. Then use that in the definitions of all non-static
inline functions.
Document the restrictions and this scheme in doc/hacking.txt.
The numbering of document.dump.color_mode and terminal._template_.colors
is now the same regardless of compile-time options, unlike in previous
versions. Therefore this version of ELinks may interpret a configuration
file differently from previous versions even if compiled with the same
options. This is unfortunate but the alternatives (keeping the numbering
dependent on configuration options; defining separate options that use
the new numbering; starting the numbers from 10 or so and recognizing the
previous ones only for compatibility) seem even worse.
This does not conflict with querying the palette from xterm (bug 890)
because although those palettes would have to be modifiable, they
would be terminal-specific rather than global.
