sort
This commit is contained in:
parent
da10808f2a
commit
e4b2a4e7ea
30
SORTING
30
SORTING
|
@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ calls "*", listing them in order.
|
|||
done
|
||||
for file in *; do echo "$file"; done
|
||||
|
||||
On one computer, running FreeBSD, the order is apparently ASCIIbetical.
|
||||
On one computer, running FreeBSD, the order is apparently
|
||||
ASCIIbetical/lexicographic.
|
||||
|
||||
! e
|
||||
- d
|
||||
|
@ -35,6 +36,27 @@ commands.
|
|||
printf '@ b\n- d\n? a\n~ c\n! e\n' | sort
|
||||
printf '@ b\n- d\n? a\n~ c\n! e\n' | sort -d
|
||||
|
||||
With BSD sort, the first of these commands print ASCIIbetical order and
|
||||
the second prints dictionary order. With GNU sort, both print dictionary
|
||||
order.
|
||||
With BusyBox v1.23.2 on NixOS 15.09, the first of these commands returns
|
||||
ASCIIbetical order, and the second returns dictionary order.
|
||||
|
||||
With GNU coreutils version 8.24 on NixOS, both commands return
|
||||
dictionary order. The same is true for GNU coreutils version 8.23 on
|
||||
Debian Wheezy.
|
||||
|
||||
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2013 Edition
|
||||
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
|
||||
|
||||
All of these versions of sort are clear about the order that should be
|
||||
returned when the "-d" flag is set. Here are results from the "--help"
|
||||
flag (info and man give similar explanations.) for BusyBox
|
||||
|
||||
-d Dictionary order (blank or alphanumeric only)
|
||||
|
||||
and GNU coreutils.
|
||||
|
||||
-d, --dictionary-order consider only blanks and alphanumeric characters
|
||||
|
||||
So the "-d" flag seems to be fine in all of these versions.
|
||||
|
||||
I have found no explicit documentation from any of the three versions
|
||||
of sort as to what the default order should be.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue