The implementation of these functions are doing anything at all at this moment.
So cleanup a bit the code by removing fnclabel and spal functions completly.
Signed-off-by: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Return statement is not a function so remove superfluous use of parenthesis.
Cc: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Lets welcome uEmacs/PK to the year 2010! As expected, the patch has no effect
on the generated code:
text data bss dec hex filename
106002 8864 18616 133482 2096a em
106002 8864 18616 133482 2096a em.new
Cc: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit 8fc7449 ("uemacs: fix sparse warnings, making file-local symbols
static.") made some functions that are not used anywhere static. This patch
removes them to kill the following compilation warnings:
ansi.c:255: warning: ‘ansihello’ defined but not used
ibmpc.c:505: warning: ‘ibmhello’ defined but not used
vmsvt.c:521: warning: ‘hellovms’ defined but not used
vt52.c:181: warning: ‘vt52hello’ defined but not used
Cc: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
ansi.c:255:6: warning: symbol 'ansihello' was not declared. Should it be static?
epath.h:11:6: warning: symbol 'pathname' was not declared. Should it be static?
display.c:36:7: warning: symbol 'vscreen' was not declared. Should it be static?
display.c:38:7: warning: symbol 'pscreen' was not declared. Should it be static?
display.c:927:5: warning: symbol 'updateline' was not declared. Should it be static?
evar.h:20:6: warning: symbol 'uv' was not declared. Should it be static?
evar.h:24:6: warning: symbol 'envars' was not declared. Should it be static?
evar.h:128:7: warning: symbol 'funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
fileio.c:14:6: warning: symbol 'ffp' was not declared. Should it be static?
fileio.c:15:5: warning: symbol 'eofflag' was not declared. Should it be static?
ibmpc.c:505:6: warning: symbol 'ibmhello' was not declared. Should it be static?
isearch.c:36:5: warning: symbol 'saved_get_char' was not declared. Should it be static?
isearch.c:37:5: warning: symbol 'eaten_char' was not declared. Should it be static?
isearch.c:41:5: warning: symbol 'cmd_buff' was not declared. Should it be static?
isearch.c:42:5: warning: symbol 'cmd_offset' was not declared. Should it be static?
isearch.c:43:5: warning: symbol 'cmd_reexecute' was not declared. Should it be static?
line.c:21:6: warning: symbol 'ykbuf' was not declared. Should it be static?
line.c:22:5: warning: symbol 'ykboff' was not declared. Should it be static?
lock.c:17:6: warning: symbol 'lname' was not declared. Should it be static?
lock.c:18:5: warning: symbol 'numlocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
vmsvt.c:521:6: warning: symbol 'hellovms' was not declared. Should it be static?
vt52.c:181:6: warning: symbol 'vt52hello' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Most of them were harmless: gcc not being smart enough to realize that
an uninitialized variable was never used if it wasn't initialized etc.
Some of them were name clashes ("crypt()" is a standard library
function, so rename it to "myencrypt()") etc.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This is a slightly updated version of uemacs-PK (PK is Pekka
Kutvonen) which was used at Helsinki University a long time
ago. My fingers cannot be retrained.
