80cd1d8992
* HACKING: Mention 'help2man'.
165 lines
7.4 KiB
Org Mode
165 lines
7.4 KiB
Org Mode
-*- mode: org; coding: utf-8; -*-
|
||
|
||
#+TITLE: Hacking GNU Guix and Its Incredible Distro
|
||
|
||
Copyright © 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
|
||
Copyright © 2013 Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org>
|
||
Copyright © 2014 Pierre-Antoine Rault <par@rigelk.eu>
|
||
|
||
Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
|
||
are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
|
||
notice and this notice are preserved.
|
||
|
||
|
||
* Building from Git
|
||
|
||
When building Guix from a checkout, the following packages are required in
|
||
addition to those mentioned in the installation instructions:
|
||
|
||
- [[http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/][GNU Autoconf]]
|
||
- [[http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/][GNU Automake]]
|
||
- [[http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/][GNU Gettext]]
|
||
- [[http://www.graphviz.org/][Graphviz]]
|
||
- [[http://www.gnu.org/software/help2man/][GNU Help2man]] (optional)
|
||
|
||
Run ‘./bootstrap’ to download the Nix daemon source code and to generate the
|
||
build system infrastructure using autoconf. It reports an error if an
|
||
inappropriate version of the above packages is being used.
|
||
|
||
If you get an error like this one:
|
||
|
||
configure.ac:46: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_CHECK_MODULES
|
||
|
||
it probably means that Autoconf couldn’t find ‘pkg.m4’, which is provided by
|
||
pkg-config. Make sure that ‘pkg.m4’ is available. For instance, if you
|
||
installed Automake in ‘/usr/local’, it wouldn’t look for ‘.m4’ files in
|
||
‘/usr/share’. So you have to invoke the following command in that case
|
||
|
||
$ export ACLOCAL_PATH=/usr/share/aclocal
|
||
|
||
See “info '(automake) Macro Search Path'” for more information.
|
||
|
||
Then, run ‘./configure’ as usual.
|
||
|
||
Finally, you have to invoke ‘make check’ to run tests. If anything fails,
|
||
take a look at “info '(guix) Installation'” or send a message to
|
||
<guix-devel@gnu.org>.
|
||
|
||
* Running Guix before it is installed
|
||
|
||
See the same-named section in the manual.
|
||
|
||
* The Perfect Setup
|
||
|
||
The Perfect Setup to hack on Guix is basically the perfect setup used
|
||
for Guile hacking (info "(guile) Using Guile in Emacs"). First, you
|
||
need more than an editor, you need [[http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs][Emacs]], empowered by the wonderful
|
||
[[http://nongnu.org/geiser/][Geiser]].
|
||
|
||
Geiser allows for interactive and incremental development from within
|
||
Emacs: code compilation and evaluation from within buffers, access to
|
||
on-line documentation (docstrings), context-sensitive completion, M-. to
|
||
jump to an object definition, a REPL to try out your code, and more.
|
||
|
||
To actually edit the code, Emacs already has a neat Scheme mode. But in
|
||
addition to that, you must not miss [[http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ParEdit][Paredit]]. It provides facilities to
|
||
directly operate on the syntax tree, such as raising an s-expression or
|
||
wrapping it, swallowing or rejecting the following s-expression, etc.
|
||
|
||
* Submitting Patches
|
||
|
||
Development is done using the Git distributed version control system. Thus,
|
||
access to the repository is not strictly necessary. We welcome contributions
|
||
in the form of patches as produced by ‘git format-patch’ sent to
|
||
guix-devel@gnu.org. Please write commit logs in the [[http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Change-Logs.html#Change-Logs][GNU ChangeLog
|
||
format]]; you can check the commit history for examples.
|
||
|
||
Before submitting a patch that adds or modifies a package definition, please
|
||
run ‘guix lint PACKAGE’, where PACKAGE is the name of the new or modified
|
||
package, and fix any errors it reports. In addition, please make sure the
|
||
package builds on your platform, using ‘guix build’. You may also want to
|
||
check that dependent package (if applicable) are not affected by the change;
|
||
‘guix refresh --list-dependent PACKAGE’ will help you do that.
|
||
|
||
When posting a patch to the mailing list, use "[PATCH] ..." as a subject. You
|
||
may use your email client or the ‘git send-mail’ command.
|
||
|
||
As you become a regular contributor, you may find it convenient to have write
|
||
access to the repository (see below.)
|
||
|
||
* Coding Style
|
||
|
||
In general our code follows the [[info:standards][GNU Coding Standards]] (GCS). However, the GCS
|
||
do not say much about Scheme, so here are some additional rules.
|
||
|
||
** Programming Paradigm
|
||
|
||
Scheme code in Guix is written in a purely functional style. One exception is
|
||
code that involves input/output, and procedures that implement low-level
|
||
concepts, such as the ‘memoize’ procedure.
|
||
|
||
** Modules
|
||
|
||
Guile modules that are meant to be used on the builder side must live in the
|
||
(guix build …) name space. They must not refer to other Guix or GNU modules.
|
||
However, it is OK for a “host-side” module to use a build-side module.
|
||
|
||
Modules that deal with the broader GNU system should be in the (gnu …) name
|
||
space rather than (guix …).
|
||
|
||
** Data Types and Pattern Matching
|
||
|
||
The tendency in classical Lisp is to use lists to represent everything, and
|
||
then to browse them “by hand” using ‘car’, ‘cdr’, ‘cadr’, and co. There are
|
||
several problems with that style, notably the fact that it is hard to read,
|
||
error-prone, and a hindrance to proper type error reports.
|
||
|
||
Guix code should define appropriate data types (for instance, using
|
||
‘define-record-type*’) rather than abuse lists. In addition, it should use
|
||
pattern matching, via Guile’s (ice-9 match) module, especially when matching
|
||
lists.
|
||
|
||
** Formatting Code
|
||
|
||
When writing Scheme code, we follow common wisdom among Scheme programmers.
|
||
In general, we follow the [[http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/style.txt][Riastradh's Lisp Style Rules]]. This document happens
|
||
to describe the conventions mostly used in Guile’s code too. It is very
|
||
thoughtful and well written, so please do read it.
|
||
|
||
Some special forms introduced in Guix, such as the ‘substitute*’ macro, have
|
||
special indentation rules. These are defined in the .dir-locals.el file,
|
||
which Emacs automatically uses. If you do not use Emacs, please make sure to
|
||
let your editor know the rules.
|
||
|
||
We require all top-level procedures to carry a docstring. This requirement
|
||
can be relaxed for simple private procedures in the (guix build …) name space,
|
||
though.
|
||
|
||
Procedures should not have more than four positional parameters. Use keyword
|
||
parameters for procedures that take more than four parameters.
|
||
|
||
* Commit Access
|
||
|
||
For frequent contributors, having write access to the repository is
|
||
convenient. When you deem it necessary, feel free to ask for it on the
|
||
mailing list. When you get commit access, please make sure to follow the
|
||
policy below (discussions of the policy can take place on guix-devel@gnu.org.)
|
||
|
||
Non-trivial patches should always be posted to guix-devel@gnu.org (trivial
|
||
patches include fixing typos, etc.)
|
||
|
||
For patches that just add a new package, and a simple one, it’s OK to commit,
|
||
if you’re confident (which means you successfully built it in a chroot setup,
|
||
and have done a reasonable copyright and license auditing.) Likewise for
|
||
package upgrades, except upgrades that trigger a lot of rebuilds (for example,
|
||
upgrading GnuTLS or GLib.) We have a mailing list for commit notifications
|
||
(guix-commits@gnu.org), so people can notice. Before pushing your changes,
|
||
make sure to run ‘git pull --rebase’.
|
||
|
||
For anything else, please post to guix-devel@gnu.org and leave time for a
|
||
review, without committing anything. If you didn’t receive any reply
|
||
after two weeks, and if you’re confident, it’s OK to commit.
|
||
|
||
That last part is subject to being adjusted, allowing individuals to commit
|
||
directly on non-controversial changes on parts they’re familiar with.
|