54869ce610
pam is so wrong, and autconf is so wrong, that people using both even manage to fuck up configure tests. so it compiles on linux, it must be right ? pathetic...
14 lines
755 B
Plaintext
14 lines
755 B
Plaintext
$OpenBSD: patch-configure,v 1.1 2010/03/01 13:41:31 espie Exp $
|
|
--- configure.orig Mon Mar 1 14:34:29 2010
|
|
+++ configure Mon Mar 1 14:35:13 2010
|
|
@@ -16705,6 +16705,9 @@ fi
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
netatalk_cv_install_pam=yes
|
|
+ if test x"$pam_found" = "xno"; then
|
|
+ netatalk_cv_install_pam=no
|
|
+ fi
|
|
if test x"$pam_found" = "xyes" -a "x$PAMDIR" = "xNONE"; then
|
|
{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: PAM support can be compiled, but the install location for the netatalk.pamd file could not be determined. Either install this file by hand or specify the install path." >&5
|
|
echo "$as_me: WARNING: PAM support can be compiled, but the install location for the netatalk.pamd file could not be determined. Either install this file by hand or specify the install path." >&2;}
|