8c1eea771b
There are probably other bad bugs in there, this code is a textbook example of how NOT to write code if you want it to work. Between the gnu style that obfuscate the stuff, the various thingies added "just in case", the misuse of autoconf results, and the really high abstraction level together with long functions and internal concepts, how can anyone make sense of this code ? (short answer: it doesn't make actual sense). Also, no cookies for the gnu guys who, along with an important bug-fix, manage *again* to push out 10000+ lines of useless diff thanks to a change in automake/autoconf itself. We don't need to make fun of Windows and its security, the GNU project manages to produce as many problems on its own... When will they learn secure practices ? I would bet "not this century", but then I probably won't be around to collect the bet... |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| patches | ||
| pkg | ||
| distinfo | ||
| Makefile | ||