This brings in ssam(1) (streaming sam; unfortunately without a manpage),
fixes the dot after the `<' command (finally!) and some small tweaks to
the manpage.
While here also add "editors" to CATEGORY and tweak a bit the
post-install hook.
ok abieber@
This switches plan9/u9fs to another upstream which has seen some small
development over the time, following what other package repositories
already did: https://bitbucket.org/plan9-from-bell-labs/u9fs
port-wise:
- tweak the COMMENT
- drop unneeded patches
- install u9fs in sbin/ rather than bin/
- install the manpage (and tweak it so it's useful in here.)
maintainer timeout, ok sthen@
this update removes some heavy optional RUN_DEPENDS to slim
down it, since it does not affect the plan9port usability itself
if someone wants to read a .ps file for example or whatever,
just install the package like `pkg_add ghostscript' then hook up a
plumber(1) pattern accordingly. it removes also the following
extra files what are not part of plan9port:
pgw.tar.bz2, roget.tar.bz2, scat.tgz
while here:
- get rid of MAP_STACK patch has been merged upstream;
- remove no longer required patches
- tidy up Makefile
thanks abieber@ for giving some tests on previous diff I sent
on ports@
(which is not) throughout the ports Makefiles.
* Replace find|xargs with find -exec {} +
* Replace -exec {} \; with -exec {} + if applicable.
* Use the -delete operator to remove files and empty directories.
* Combine and tweak some find(1) invocations while here.
ok kn@ rsadowski@ espie@
As of ONLY_FOR_ARCHS we support more than x86; as for the rest this list
is probably outdated/incomplete as well and generally providese little to
no information, so remove it.
OK gsoares
e995a0c101863688d5f14649ae3de45a7c43789c
zap patch-bin_web merged upstream
patch from Patrick Marchand <pmarchand@evolix.ca>, thanks!
with some tweaks by me.
Restrictive PERMIT_*; CONFIGURE_STYLE=imake; no updates in 15+ years.
If you're itching for the Plan 9 window experience, plan9port has rio.
ok markus@ (former 9wm maintainer)
changes (CPUSTATES/etc). Last part.
- some of these might be in code that's not actually built or rarely
used but it's not worth the hassle evaluating that, i'm just bumping &
moving on.
- as mentioned before, there might still be runtime problems relating
to the addition or renumbering.
