Although latexmk is included in texlive, we omit it in favour of our
separate port. texlive_base should not install a symlink.
There was also confusion between latex-mk and latexmk. We have both in
ports, but the latter is the one related to texlive. Let's mark is as a soft
dependency.
Upgrade path is currently leaving a partial package behind due to the bogus
symlink. A quirk will probably be required, which we can commit later.
OK ajacoutot@
This started as a fix (arm, ppc) for the internal icu in texlive. It turns
out a custom icu is not needed anymore, so we can use the icu in the ports
tree. This makes handling of header files much simpler since there is no
longer the possibility of picking up the wrong icu headers. Should also fix
PPC and ARM builds of texlive.
Also noticed a few other libraries being built into texlive. Fixed.
Finally, readme was not being installed. Fixed.
Reported by landry@
OK dcoppa@, landry@, and with input and testing from kili@.
1) If the user updates only the buildset, ensure hashing occurs.
2) When I moved stuff from PLIST-main to PLIST-buildset, I should have
updated a conflict marker and added a tighter RUN_DEPEND. This ensures
that the two packages affected are updated together.
OK sthen@
Now that the last of the ports which was installing in the deprecated
TEXMFMAIN have been fixed, the TEXMFMAIN texmf tree can dissappear. We do
this by falling in line with the upstream configurations.
OK naddy@
many were in pre-formatted form in other packages so they didn't actually
conflict previously even though the PLIST entry was identical - recently
a number of these are now installed as unformatted pages which has caused
a real conflict. No substantial diff between texmf's versions and the
other preformatted pages (minor whitespace changes due to groff/mandoc
differences, that's all).
for consistency with the gem/extconf ports.
Update non-gem/extconf ports that relied on the previous
default of ruby 1.8 to explicitly specify it.
OK ajacoutot@
Many people have mailed me successful test reports and matthieu tells me he
has been running this for some time now.
Thanks to those that tested.
OK matthieu@
scripts. add @conflict marker to texlive and remove/unlink pdfjam.
- add missing @man annotation in texmf
conflict noted by naddy@. ok ajacoutot@ espie@
* Separates conTeXt into it's own sub-package (texlive_texmf-context).
* Patches in correct paths for texmfcnf.lua
* Creates the luatex cache at install time of texlive_texmf-context.
* Updates documentation relating to the above.
* Use %D in all hashing @exec/@unexec.
* Fix a bogus LOCALBASE, which should have been a TRUEPREFIX.
* Small tidy ups.
OK kili@
Emulate texlinks, so that those pesky symlinks are now in the packing list.
Minor plist tidy-ups that help fix the upgrade (see recent quirks commit).
OK kili@, espie@
PLIST and delete everything under the @sample'd directory instead of the
directory itself to prevent a warning from pkg_delete(1) trying to
remove a non existing directory and to help preventing left-over files
and directories.
This year we pre-generate format and maps as requested by kili.
Started adding test cases in the tests/ dir.
Upgrades from 2009 will cause a harmless warning regarding texlinks. Espie is
aware of this, it was not easily fixable.
Uninstalls of texlive 2010 which were previously upgraded from 2009 will make
lots of noise regarding non-empty directories which can not be deleted. This
is due to unregistered package directories in the old texlive 2009 pacakage and
has been fixed in the 2010 package (rblatter script was modified to register
*all* parent dirs in PLISTs).
Installs/uninstalls of texlive 2010 on a fresh system (which has never
seen texlive 2009) are squeaky clean.
This has been in use for a number of months on my work machine, so should be
pretty stable, but I am sure someone will find some obscure bugs. These can be
fixed in tree.
OK espie@
