Commit Graph

22 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
sthen
48b0b9660c replace simple PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=Yes with PERMIT_PACKAGE=Yes 2019-07-12 20:48:23 +00:00
sthen
25f0e460f2 Add COMPILER lines to c++ ports which currently use the default. Adjust
some existing COMPILER lines with arch restrictions etc. In the usual
case this is now using "COMPILER = base-clang ports-gcc base-gcc" on
ports with c++ libraries in WANTLIB.

This is basically intended to be a noop on architectures using clang
as the system compiler, but help with other architectures where we
currently have many ports knocked out due to building with an unsuitable
compiler -

- some ports require c++11/newer so the GCC version in base that is used
on these archirtectures is too old.

- some ports have conflicts where an executable is built with one compiler
(e.g. gcc from base) but a library dependency is built with a different
one (e.g. gcc from ports), resulted in mixing incompatible libraries in the
same address space.

devel/gmp is intentionally skipped as it's on the path to building gcc -
the c++ library there is unused in ports (and not built by default upstream)
so intending to disable building gmpcxx in a future commit.
2018-10-24 14:27:57 +00:00
espie
a3cc216348 @tag update-mime-database 2018-07-01 18:33:35 +00:00
espie
c36d0659b9 @tag gtk-update-icon-cache 2018-06-29 22:16:08 +00:00
espie
150a0f36fa first tag: update-desktop-database 2018-06-27 21:03:34 +00:00
sthen
5e964ab0df bump LIBCXX/LIBECXX/COMPILER_LIBCXX ports. 2017-07-26 22:45:14 +00:00
espie
c114d7057b add pthread to COMPILER_LIBCXX.
white lie, but it allows clang and gcc to be more similar
bump accordingly.
2017-07-23 09:26:25 +00:00
espie
8ac47fd9c6 use COMPILER_LIBCXX where applicable 2017-07-16 19:18:47 +00:00
sthen
073d25a37c use LIBCXX 2017-04-10 11:46:32 +00:00
steven
7a2b7056c4 update to 2.0.3
from Rafael Sadowski, ok landry@
2016-10-23 13:53:04 +00:00
naddy
42bc647e80 remove SHARED_ONLY from ports that only use modules that neither set nor
read this variable
2016-03-18 23:12:15 +00:00
steven
37fb078fca update to 2.0.2
from Rafael Sadowski
2016-03-14 18:20:54 +00:00
landry
189fbdac5e Update to keepassx 2.0, From Rafael Sadowski.
No objection from steven@ (MAINTAINER) ok mmcc@
2015-12-18 10:26:29 +00:00
jasper
458abeba7e Security fix for CVE-2015-8378
ok steven@ (MAINTAINER)
2015-12-07 18:26:01 +00:00
jasper
289f056a13 add working master site 2015-12-02 13:08:30 +00:00
naddy
570aa62a9c Drop remaining MD5/RMD160/SHA1 checksums. 2015-01-18 03:12:39 +00:00
espie
eae66e4a7b PERMIT_* / REGRESS->TEST sweep 2013-03-11 11:35:43 +00:00
ajacoutot
6a25f21ca1 Regen PLIST.
req by espie@
2012-04-28 14:08:53 +00:00
espie
46d3548829 normalize pkgpath 2011-09-16 11:41:38 +00:00
sthen
d580cde0ab fix various typos, from Anthony J. Bentley with a few tweaks by myself 2011-03-14 09:15:33 +00:00
espie
6c283d7e98 new depends 2010-11-20 17:22:40 +00:00
steven
ab605774a4 import keepassx 0.4.3
KeePassX is an application for people with extremly high demands on
secure personal data management. It has a light interface, is cross
platform and published under the terms of the GNU General Public
License.

KeePassX saves many different information e.g. user names, passwords,
URLs, attachments and comments in one single database. For a better
management user-defined titles and icons can be specified for each
single entry. Furthermore the entries are sorted in groups, which are
customizable as well. The integrated search function allows to search
in a single group or the complete database.
KeePassX offers a little utility for secure password generation. The
password generator is very customizable, fast and easy to use.
Especially someone who generates passwords frequently will appreciate
this feature.

The complete database is always encrypted either with AES (alias
Rijndael) or Twofish encryption algorithm using a 256 bit key.
Therefore the saved information can be considered as quite safe.
KeePassX uses a database format that is compatible with KeePass
Password Safe. This makes the use of that application even more
favourable.

ok landry@
2010-10-24 14:39:57 +00:00