this patch is visibly wrong. pval@ should have seen this before commiting it.
espie@ OK'ed this fix.
This commit is contained in:
parent
330bff822e
commit
83ba32bd96
@ -1,19 +1,22 @@
|
||||
$OpenBSD: gcc-lib_Makefile_in,v 1.2 2002/04/04 04:50:43 pvalchev Exp $
|
||||
--- lib/Makefile.in.orig Sun Nov 18 12:01:58 2001
|
||||
+++ lib/Makefile.in Wed Apr 3 21:40:57 2002
|
||||
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ LIBS = @LIBS@
|
||||
libmhash_la_LIBADD =
|
||||
libmhash_la_OBJECTS = mhash.lo swap.lo bzero.lo crc32.lo md5.lo sha1.lo \
|
||||
haval.lo tiger.lo tiger_sboxes.lo gosthash.lo keygen_hex.lo \
|
||||
$OpenBSD: gcc-lib_Makefile_in,v 1.3 2002/04/12 22:51:51 lebel Exp $
|
||||
--- lib/Makefile.in.orig Sun Nov 18 14:01:58 2001
|
||||
+++ lib/Makefile.in Fri Apr 12 10:49:31 2002
|
||||
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ crc32.lo crc32.o : crc32.c mhash_crc32.h
|
||||
gosthash.lo gosthash.o : gosthash.c libdefs.h ../mhash_config.h \
|
||||
gosthash.h
|
||||
haval.lo haval.o : haval.c libdefs.h ../mhash_config.h mhash_haval.h
|
||||
+ ${LTCOMPILE} -O0 -c haval.c
|
||||
keygen_mcrypt.lo keygen_asis.lo keygen.lo keygen_s2k.lo ripemd.lo \
|
||||
md4.lo sha256.lo adler32.lo
|
||||
CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@
|
||||
@@ -293,6 +294,7 @@ mhash.lo mhash.o : mhash.c libdefs.h ../
|
||||
keygen.lo keygen.o : keygen.c libdefs.h ../mhash_config.h mhash_int.h \
|
||||
keygen.h
|
||||
keygen_asis.lo keygen_asis.o : keygen_asis.c libdefs.h ../mhash_config.h
|
||||
@@ -293,8 +294,10 @@ mhash.lo mhash.o : mhash.c libdefs.h ../
|
||||
gosthash.h
|
||||
ripemd.lo ripemd.o : ripemd.c mhash_ripemd.h libdefs.h ../mhash_config.h
|
||||
sha1.lo sha1.o : sha1.c mhash_sha1.h libdefs.h ../mhash_config.h
|
||||
+ ${LTCOMPILE} -O0 -c sha1.c
|
||||
sha256.lo sha256.o : sha256.c libdefs.h ../mhash_config.h mhash_sha256.h \
|
||||
mhash_sha1.h
|
||||
+ ${LTCOMPILE} -O0 -c sha256.c
|
||||
swap.lo swap.o : swap.c libdefs.h ../mhash_config.h
|
||||
tiger.lo tiger.o : tiger.c mhash_tiger.h libdefs.h ../mhash_config.h
|
||||
tiger_sboxes.lo tiger_sboxes.o : tiger_sboxes.c libdefs.h \
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user