cpet/openbsd-ports
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update to v1.0.5. ok markus@.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
jakob 2001-05-23 15:28:49 +00:00
parent d19ed8bd90
commit 436c5ffef5
8 changed files with 63 additions and 236 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
security/gnupg/Makefile
View File

@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.28 2001/04/17 20:53:04 reinhard Exp $ # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.29 2001/05/23 15:28:49 jakob Exp $
COMMENT= 'GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement' COMMENT= 'GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement'
DISTNAME= gnupg-1.0.4 DISTNAME= gnupg-1.0.5
PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}p2 PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}
CATEGORIES= security CATEGORIES= security
NEED_VERSION= 1.363 NEED_VERSION= 1.363
MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/gnupg/ \ MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/gnupg/ \
@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/gnupg/ \
ftp://ftp.net.lut.ac.uk/gcrypt/gnupg/ \ ftp://ftp.net.lut.ac.uk/gcrypt/gnupg/ \
ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/privacy/gnupg/gnupg/ ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/privacy/gnupg/gnupg/
MASTER_SITES0= ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/contrib/ MASTER_SITES0= ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/contrib/
DISTFILES= gnupg-1.0.4.tar.gz DISTFILES= ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX}
EXTRACT_ONLY= gnupg-1.0.4.tar.gz EXTRACT_ONLY= ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX}
HOMEPAGE= http://www.gnupg.org/ HOMEPAGE= http://www.gnupg.org/
@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM= "a patented algorithm"
PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= "a patented algorithm" PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= "a patented algorithm"
# NB: idea.c is found in ${MASTER_SITES0} # NB: idea.c is found in ${MASTER_SITES0}
DISTFILES+= idea.c:0 DISTFILES+= idea.c:0
PATCH_LIST= patch-*
PATCH_LIST+= ${FILESDIR}/patch-cipher_Makefile_am PATCH_LIST+= ${FILESDIR}/patch-cipher_Makefile_am
PATCH_LIST+= ${FILESDIR}/patch-cipher_Makefile_in PATCH_LIST+= ${FILESDIR}/patch-cipher_Makefile_in
SED_PLIST+= -e 's,^!%%idea%%,lib/gnupg/idea,'
pre-patch: pre-patch:
@cp ${DISTDIR}/idea.c ${WRKSRC}/cipher @cp ${DISTDIR}/idea.c ${WRKSRC}/cipher
.endif .endif

6
security/gnupg/files/md5
View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
MD5 (gnupg-1.0.4.tar.gz) = bef2267bfe9b74a00906a78db34437f9 MD5 (gnupg-1.0.5.tar.gz) = 44c71c3f5a9edbf5738cafc37e8359e6
RMD160 (gnupg-1.0.4.tar.gz) = 62fd2470c7eefb9e7c80d4e3337cce6547803157
SHA1 (gnupg-1.0.4.tar.gz) = 7940d42ddf4e992152232b837e25f6b462622df5
MD5 (idea.c) = 7d0557459e0a41da099ddbd837d4bd40 MD5 (idea.c) = 7d0557459e0a41da099ddbd837d4bd40
RMD160 (gnupg-1.0.5.tar.gz) = aae6687dac926ee8d423e6d82e86bf27f263175c
RMD160 (idea.c) = 86ac117facd1fe498a6b964bce9ba1ce6e2ab094 RMD160 (idea.c) = 86ac117facd1fe498a6b964bce9ba1ce6e2ab094
SHA1 (gnupg-1.0.5.tar.gz) = e30358cae1e1f7aece84b6808b1366f12a1ff527
SHA1 (idea.c) = 1cbae164674dfb9da624e088fe7d66d7c0d4f17e SHA1 (idea.c) = 1cbae164674dfb9da624e088fe7d66d7c0d4f17e

39
security/gnupg/patches/patch-g10_misc.c
View File

@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: gnupg-announce@gnupg.org
Subject: [Announce] Minor gpg fix
Message-ID: <20001018160137.O15768@gnupg.de>
Hi,
some folks asked what the message
gpg: this cipher algorithm is depreciated; please use a more standard one!
does mean. Yes, gpg 1.0.4 should not emit this message. I forgot
to put the AES cipher algorithm into the list of "good" algorithms.
Either ignore this message or apply the patch below.
Werner
Index: g10/misc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/koch/cvs/gnupg/g10/misc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.16.2.4
diff -u -r1.16.2.4 misc.c
--- g10/misc.c 2000/10/13 15:03:48 1.16.2.4
+++ g10/misc.c 2000/10/18 13:34:01
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@
|| algo == CIPHER_ALGO_CAST5
|| algo == CIPHER_ALGO_BLOWFISH
|| algo == CIPHER_ALGO_TWOFISH
+ || algo == CIPHER_ALGO_RIJNDAEL
+ || algo == CIPHER_ALGO_RIJNDAEL192
+ || algo == CIPHER_ALGO_RIJNDAEL256
)
;
else {

82
security/gnupg/patches/patch-g10_openfile.c
View File

@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
From ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-1.0.4.security-patch1.diff
Hi!
It has been pointed out that there is another bug in the signature
verification code of GnuPG.
* This can easily lead to false positives *
All versions of GnuPG released before today are vulnerable!
To check a detached singature you normally do this:
gpg --verify foo.sig foo.txt
The problem here is that someone may replace foo.sig with a standard
signature containing some arbitrary signed text and its signature,
and then modify foo.txt - GnuPG does not detect this - Ooops.
The solution for this problem ist not easy and needs a change in the
semantics of the --verify command: It will not any longer be
possible to do this:
gpg --verify foo.sig <foo.txt
Instead you have to use this
gpg --verify foo.sig - <foo.txt
The difference here is that gpg sees 2 files on the command lines
and thereby knows that it should check a detached signature. We
really need this information and there is no way to avoid that
change, sorry. You should make sure that you never use the first
form, because this will lead to false positives when foo.sig is not
a detached signature - gnupg does detect the other case and warns
you, but this is not sufficient. If you use GnuPG from other
applications, please change it.
What to do:
1. Apply the attached patch to GnuPG 1.0.4
2. Check all programs which are designed to verify detached
signatures, that they don't use the vulnerable way of passing
data to GnuPG.
Currently we are reviewing some other minor bug fixes and
it might take some time to release a fixed version.
I apologize for this bug and have to thank Rene Puls for finding it.
Werner
p.s.
I'd really appreciate if some volunteers can write more regression
tests; especially those for bugs of this kind.
Apply the patch using "patch -p1" while in the top directory of the
GnuPG source. The patch is against the 1.0.4 release.
--- g10/openfile.c.orig Tue Sep 5 17:31:57 2000
+++ g10/openfile.c Sat Dec 23 14:56:19 2000
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ open_sigfile( const char *iname )
buf = m_strdup(iname);
buf[len-4] = 0 ;
a = iobuf_open( buf );
- if( opt.verbose )
+ if( a && opt.verbose )
log_info(_("assuming signed data in `%s'\n"), buf );
m_free(buf);
}
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ try_make_homedir( const char *fname )
if ( ( *defhome == '~'
&& ( strlen(fname) >= strlen (defhome+1)
- && !strcmp(fname+strlen(defhome+1)-strlen(defhome+1),
+ && !strcmp(fname+strlen(fname)-strlen(defhome+1),
defhome+1 ) ))
|| ( *defhome != '~'
&& !compare_filenames( fname, defhome ) )

104
security/gnupg/patches/patch-g10_plaintext.c
View File

@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
From ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-1.0.4.security-patch1.diff
Hi!
It has been pointed out that there is another bug in the signature
verification code of GnuPG.
* This can easily lead to false positives *
All versions of GnuPG released before today are vulnerable!
To check a detached singature you normally do this:
gpg --verify foo.sig foo.txt
The problem here is that someone may replace foo.sig with a standard
signature containing some arbitrary signed text and its signature,
and then modify foo.txt - GnuPG does not detect this - Ooops.
The solution for this problem ist not easy and needs a change in the
semantics of the --verify command: It will not any longer be
possible to do this:
gpg --verify foo.sig <foo.txt
Instead you have to use this
gpg --verify foo.sig - <foo.txt
The difference here is that gpg sees 2 files on the command lines
and thereby knows that it should check a detached signature. We
really need this information and there is no way to avoid that
change, sorry. You should make sure that you never use the first
form, because this will lead to false positives when foo.sig is not
a detached signature - gnupg does detect the other case and warns
you, but this is not sufficient. If you use GnuPG from other
applications, please change it.
What to do:
1. Apply the attached patch to GnuPG 1.0.4
2. Check all programs which are designed to verify detached
signatures, that they don't use the vulnerable way of passing
data to GnuPG.
Currently we are reviewing some other minor bug fixes and
it might take some time to release a fixed version.
I apologize for this bug and have to thank Rene Puls for finding it.
Werner
p.s.
I'd really appreciate if some volunteers can write more regression
tests; especially those for bugs of this kind.
Apply the patch using "patch -p1" while in the top directory of the
GnuPG source. The patch is against the 1.0.4 release.
--- g10/plaintext.c.orig Wed Jul 26 11:21:58 2000
+++ g10/plaintext.c Sat Dec 23 14:51:54 2000
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ hash_datafiles( MD_HANDLE md, MD_HANDLE
const char *sigfilename, int textmode )
{
IOBUF fp;
- STRLIST sl=NULL;
+ STRLIST sl;
if( !files ) {
/* check whether we can open the signed material */
@@ -380,27 +380,21 @@ hash_datafiles( MD_HANDLE md, MD_HANDLE
iobuf_close(fp);
return 0;
}
- /* no we can't (no sigfile) - read signed stuff from stdin */
- add_to_strlist( &sl, "-");
+ log_error (_("no signed data\n"));
+ return G10ERR_OPEN_FILE;
}
- else
- sl = files;
- for( ; sl; sl = sl->next ) {
+ for (sl=files; sl; sl = sl->next ) {
fp = iobuf_open( sl->d );
if( !fp ) {
log_error(_("can't open signed data `%s'\n"),
print_fname_stdin(sl->d));
- if( !files )
- free_strlist(sl);
return G10ERR_OPEN_FILE;
}
do_hash( md, md2, fp, textmode );
iobuf_close(fp);
}
- if( !files )
- free_strlist(sl);
return 0;
}

34
security/gnupg/patches/patch-po_Makefile.in.in Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
$OpenBSD: patch-po_Makefile.in.in,v 1.1 2001/05/23 15:28:50 jakob Exp $
--- po/Makefile.in.in.orig Wed May 23 16:15:53 2001
+++ po/Makefile.in.in Wed May 23 16:20:20 2001
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ gnulocaledir = $(prefix)/share/locale
gettextsrcdir = $(prefix)/share/gettext/po
subdir = po
+DESTDIR =
+
INSTALL = @INSTALL@
INSTALL_DATA = @INSTALL_DATA@
MKINSTALLDIRS = $(top_srcdir)/@MKINSTALLDIRS@
@@ -111,16 +113,16 @@ install-data: install-data-@USE_NLS@
install-data-no: all
install-data-yes: all
if test -r "$(MKINSTALLDIRS)"; then \
- $(MKINSTALLDIRS) $(datadir); \
+ $(MKINSTALLDIRS) $(DESTDIR)$(datadir); \
else \
- $(SHELL) $(top_srcdir)/mkinstalldirs $(datadir); \
+ $(SHELL) $(top_srcdir)/mkinstalldirs $(DESTDIR)$(datadir); \
fi
@catalogs='$(CATALOGS)'; \
for cat in $$catalogs; do \
cat=`basename $$cat`; \
case "$$cat" in \
- *.gmo) destdir=$(gnulocaledir);; \
- *) destdir=$(localedir);; \
+ *.gmo) destdir=$(DESTDIR)$(gnulocaledir);; \
+ *) destdir=$(DESTDIR)$(localedir);; \
esac; \
lang=`echo $$cat | sed 's/\$(CATOBJEXT)$$//'`; \
dir=$$destdir/$$lang/LC_MESSAGES; \

2
security/gnupg/pkg/PFRAG.idea Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
@comment $OpenBSD: PFRAG.idea,v 1.1 2001/05/23 15:28:50 jakob Exp $
lib/gnupg/idea

20
security/gnupg/pkg/PLIST
View File

@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
@comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.8 2001/03/03 17:17:28 reinhard Exp $ @comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.9 2001/05/23 15:28:50 jakob Exp $
bin/gpg bin/gpg
bin/gpgv bin/gpgv
lib/gnupg/rndunix lib/gnupg/rndunix
lib/gnupg/rndegd lib/gnupg/rndegd
lib/gnupg/tiger lib/gnupg/tiger
!%%idea%% %%idea%%
man/man1/gpg.1 man/man1/gpg.1
man/man1/gpgv.1 man/man1/gpgv.1
share/doc/gnupg/README share/doc/gnupg/README
@ -19,6 +19,22 @@ share/doc/gnupg/OpenPGP
share/doc/gnupg/HACKING share/doc/gnupg/HACKING
share/doc/gnupg/faq.html share/doc/gnupg/faq.html
share/gnupg/options.skel share/gnupg/options.skel
share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/et/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/pt_PT/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/gnupg.mo
@dirrm lib/gnupg @dirrm lib/gnupg
@dirrm share/doc/gnupg @dirrm share/doc/gnupg
@dirrm share/gnupg @dirrm share/gnupg