cpet/openbsd-ports
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

security update, since 1.0.3 does not detect modifications of files with multiple signatures

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
markus 2000-10-30 12:52:32 +00:00
parent fba294b934
commit 07aae00303
5 changed files with 60 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
security/gnupg/Makefile
View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.21 2000/10/22 17:02:41 espie Exp $
# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.22 2000/10/30 12:52:32 markus Exp $
DISTNAME= gnupg-1.0.3
DISTNAME= gnupg-1.0.4
CATEGORIES= security
NEED_VERSION= 1.320
MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/gnupg/ \
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS= --disable-nls
GNUPGDOCDIR= ${PREFIX}/share/doc/gnupg
GNUPGDOCFILES= README AUTHORS COPYING THANKS TODO BUGS \
doc/DETAILS doc/FAQ doc/OpenPGP doc/HACKING
doc/DETAILS doc/FAQ doc/OpenPGP doc/HACKING doc/faq.html
post-install:
${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${GNUPGDOCDIR}

6
security/gnupg/files/md5
View File

@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
MD5 (gnupg-1.0.3.tar.gz) = ef42c679df7a555e23ebe3c8d14a9124
RMD160 (gnupg-1.0.3.tar.gz) = 1f884122fad2cf3fff19e60bb5d71533afff1162
SHA1 (gnupg-1.0.3.tar.gz) = 5cfc7335dddf9c7857c7ab55198a27cb58fea225
MD5 (gnupg-1.0.4.tar.gz) = bef2267bfe9b74a00906a78db34437f9
RMD160 (gnupg-1.0.4.tar.gz) = 62fd2470c7eefb9e7c80d4e3337cce6547803157
SHA1 (gnupg-1.0.4.tar.gz) = 7940d42ddf4e992152232b837e25f6b462622df5

11
security/gnupg/patches/patch-doc_Makefile.in Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
--- doc/Makefile.in.orig Mon Oct 30 13:03:14 2000
+++ doc/Makefile.in Tue Oct 17 15:40:48 2000
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
man_MANS = gpg.1 gpgv.1
-pkgdata_DATA = FAQ faq.html
+#pkgdata_DATA = FAQ faq.html
BUILT_SOURCES = FAQ faq.html

39
security/gnupg/patches/patch-g10_misc.c Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: gnupg-announce@gnupg.org
Subject: [Announce] Minor gpg fix
Message-ID: <20001018160137.O15768@gnupg.de>
Hi,
some folks asked what the message
gpg: this cipher algorithm is depreciated; please use a more standard one!
does mean. Yes, gpg 1.0.4 should not emit this message. I forgot
to put the AES cipher algorithm into the list of "good" algorithms.
Either ignore this message or apply the patch below.
Werner
Index: g10/misc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/koch/cvs/gnupg/g10/misc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.16.2.4
diff -u -r1.16.2.4 misc.c
--- g10/misc.c 2000/10/13 15:03:48 1.16.2.4
+++ g10/misc.c 2000/10/18 13:34:01
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@
|| algo == CIPHER_ALGO_CAST5
|| algo == CIPHER_ALGO_BLOWFISH
|| algo == CIPHER_ALGO_TWOFISH
+ || algo == CIPHER_ALGO_RIJNDAEL
+ || algo == CIPHER_ALGO_RIJNDAEL192
+ || algo == CIPHER_ALGO_RIJNDAEL256
)
;
else {

5
security/gnupg/pkg/PLIST
View File

@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
@comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.6 2000/06/29 06:06:31 brad Exp $
@comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.7 2000/10/30 12:52:32 markus Exp $
bin/gpg
bin/gpgv
lib/gnupg/rndunix
lib/gnupg/rndegd
lib/gnupg/tiger
man/man1/gpg.1
man/man1/gpgv.1
share/doc/gnupg/README
share/doc/gnupg/AUTHORS
share/doc/gnupg/COPYING
@ -14,6 +16,7 @@ share/doc/gnupg/DETAILS
share/doc/gnupg/FAQ
share/doc/gnupg/OpenPGP
share/doc/gnupg/HACKING
share/doc/gnupg/faq.html
share/gnupg/options.skel
@dirrm lib/gnupg
@dirrm share/doc/gnupg