openbsd-ports/archivers/unarj/Makefile

# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.21 2010/07/11 15:57:47 espie Exp $
# $FreeBSD: Makefile,v 1.12 1999/02/17 22:25:36 ache Exp $

COMMENT=	extract files from ARJ archives

DISTNAME=	unarj-2.43
CATEGORIES=	archivers
MASTER_SITES=	ftp://ftp.kiarchive.ru/pub/unix/arcers/
EXTRACT_SUFX=	.tgz

# Restrictive
PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=	No
PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP=	No
PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM=	No
PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP=	No

REVISION =	0
WANTLIB=		c

MAKE_ENV=	CC="${CC}" CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"

do-install:
	${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/doc/unarj
	cd ${WRKSRC}; ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} unarj ${PREFIX}/bin
	cd ${WRKSRC}; ${INSTALL_DATA} unarj.doc technote.doc ${PREFIX}/share/doc/unarj

NO_REGRESS=	Yes

.include <bsd.port.mk>
switch to REVISION 2010-07-11 11:57:46 -04:00			`# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.21 2010/07/11 15:57:47 espie Exp $`
upgrade to unarj 2.43 1999-03-03 22:49:12 -05:00			`# $FreeBSD: Makefile,v 1.12 1999/02/17 22:25:36 ache Exp $`
1997-11-16 16:36:02 -05:00
zap all quotes in COMMENT/PERMIT_* 2007-09-15 06:14:32 -04:00			`COMMENT= extract files from ARJ archives`
+ rename patches + integrate COMMENT + bump version ports/archivers - ports@ maintained ports 2001-03-29 06:41:17 -05:00
- remove FAKE=Yes - add @comment with RCS id to PLIST - HAS_CONFIGURE/GNU_CONFIGURE -> CONFIGURE_STYLE - remove NO_CONFIGURE, NO_PATCH - use new framework for PLISTs 2000-06-10 16:22:13 -04:00			`DISTNAME= unarj-2.43`
1997-11-16 16:36:02 -05:00			`CATEGORIES= archivers`
upgrade to unarj 2.43 1999-03-03 22:49:12 -05:00			`MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.kiarchive.ru/pub/unix/arcers/`
			`EXTRACT_SUFX= .tgz`
1997-11-16 16:36:02 -05:00
lzo -- # GPL lzop -- # GNU GPL -> # GPL macutil -- sync w/# None style nulib -- # Restrictive rar -- # Restrictive ucl -- # GPL unace -- # Copyrighted but freely distributable. That's all the author states. Is this acceptable as a license? -- Drop MAINTAINER per his request unarj -- # Restrictive PERMIT_*_CDROM=No "If you wish to distribute a modified version of UNARJ you MUST indicate that it is a modified version both in the program and source code." unrar -- # Restrictive unzip -- # Conditional It is freely re-distributable with conditions which we meet. This could use another pair of eyes to confirm. zip -- # Conditional Same thing as unzip. zoo -- # Conditional Different author/license but same idea as zip/unzip. 2003-05-23 22:40:42 -04:00			`# Restrictive`
			`PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= No`
			`PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP= No`
			`PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM= No`
			`PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= No`
Zap useless heading/trailing blank lines. 2010-04-15 09:27:47 -04:00
switch to REVISION 2010-07-11 11:57:46 -04:00			`REVISION = 0`
Mark all system libs in WANTLIB, result of running newlib-depends-check 2004-11-21 07:50:32 -05:00			`WANTLIB= c`
license. strictly nofee. restrict cdrom. permit ftp. 2000-03-04 13:19:04 -05:00
acknowledge ${CC} and ${CFLAGS} 2002-07-17 16:15:30 -04:00			`MAKE_ENV= CC="${CC}" CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"`

1997-11-16 16:36:02 -05:00			`do-install:`
Fake 2000-03-26 17:50:03 -05:00			`${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/doc/unarj`
			`cd ${WRKSRC}; ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} unarj ${PREFIX}/bin`
			`cd ${WRKSRC}; ${INSTALL_DATA} unarj.doc technote.doc ${PREFIX}/share/doc/unarj`
1997-11-16 16:36:02 -05:00
Note existing regression tests for archivers. No need to update NEED_VERSION, this won't break anything otherwise. 2001-10-04 18:26:48 -04:00			`NO_REGRESS= Yes`

1997-11-16 16:36:02 -05:00			`.include <bsd.port.mk>`