125faea51f
Constraint Grammar (CG) parsers are at the core of most of VISL's live applications. The Constraint Grammar concept was launched by Fred Karlsson in the early 90'ies (Karlsson et.al.1995), and CG parsers have since been written for a large variety of languages, routinely achieving F-scores for PoS (word class) of over 99%. A number of syntactic CG systems have reported F-scores of around 95%. VISL's own Constraint Grammar systems are inspired by Eckhard Bick's PALAVRAS parser for Portuguese (Bick 2000), and use, as a novelty, subclause function, generalized dependency markers and semantic prototype tags. For most languages, a lexicon based morphological analyzer provides input to the first CG level, while the output of the last CG-level can be converted into syntactic tree structures by specially designed Phrase Structure Grammars (PSG's), using syntactic functions, not words, as terminals. Other, hybrid combinations are, however, feasible. Thus, the French system uses PoS information from a probabilistic tagger. WWW: https://visl.sdu.dk/constraint_grammar.html
18 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
18 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
Constraint Grammar (CG) parsers are at the core of most of VISL's live
|
|
applications. The Constraint Grammar concept was launched by Fred
|
|
Karlsson in the early 90'ies (Karlsson et.al.1995), and CG parsers have
|
|
since been written for a large variety of languages, routinely achieving
|
|
F-scores for PoS (word class) of over 99%. A number of syntactic CG
|
|
systems have reported F-scores of around 95%. VISL's own Constraint
|
|
Grammar systems are inspired by Eckhard Bick's PALAVRAS parser for
|
|
Portuguese (Bick 2000), and use, as a novelty, subclause function,
|
|
generalized dependency markers and semantic prototype tags. For most
|
|
languages, a lexicon based morphological analyzer provides input to the
|
|
first CG level, while the output of the last CG-level can be converted
|
|
into syntactic tree structures by specially designed Phrase Structure
|
|
Grammars (PSG's), using syntactic functions, not words, as terminals.
|
|
Other, hybrid combinations are, however, feasible. Thus, the French
|
|
system uses PoS information from a probabilistic tagger.
|
|
|
|
WWW: https://visl.sdu.dk/constraint_grammar.html
|