from the files-dir could be nuked, as requested by Satoshi and others.
- Modified BUILD_DEPENDS to use ${LOCALBASE} variable instead of
an absolute path.
- packaging tested on both ports fbsd-icons and fvwm95 ;-)
fine xpm files, that show a "FreeBSD 95" logo with devel.
Made this ,,devel logo'' the default logo for the fvwm port
(instead of the Linux Logo ;-).
It now looks really beautiful.
Port packages still fine Satoshi ;-))
PR: closes definitively PR 3607 (closed!)
Submitted by: Jochim Jäckel <JJaeckel@compuserve.com>
- Updated Plist
- Removed unnecessary post-configure, since example rc file isn't
in the files-dir anymore
- Port Packages still fine ;-) (tested, tested !!! ;-)
PR: closes PR 2986
Submitted by: Lars Koeller <Lars_Koeller@odie.physik2.uni-rostock.de>
- changed icon paths in the real rc file in the sources
- tabified the file a bit
- removed occurrences of xterm_color and substituted them
by xterm +cm -tn xterm-color
- Wrong icon paths in the system.fvwm95rc file were causing
fvwm95 to function improperly.
PR: closes 3511 (closed!)
Add conditionals to allow installation of hi-color icons
added two 8bit icons that don't come with distribution
remove obsolete patchfile.
Submitted by: Jeremy Prior <jez@netcraft.co.uk>
diverge too much from the original (other than internationalization,
of course). Closes PR ports/2854.
Submitted by: Makoto MATSUSHITA <matusita@ics.es.osaka-u.ac.jp>
But this change made it necessary to choose absolute path names,
since a /usr/X11R6/lib/librplay.a doesn't exists.
Even CONFIGURE_ARGS need absolute path names now, otherwise
modules/FvwmAudio doesn't compile.
But now packaging works, thanks Andrey.
The fvwm95 developement team makes good progress ;-))
One thing I doesn't understand when making the port:
When doing make package, then the first @cwd in PLIST isn't
used, so fvwm96 is packaged as /usr/local/bin/fvwm95 instead
of /usr/X11R6/bin/fvwm95.
Would someone please be so kind to look at this. Is it me or
is pkg_add misbehaving ?!
PLISTs.
Note: I know that this is going to break some symlinks and/or .so
includes, I will back some of these out as I run into these during
package building.
all the COMMENTs! No package names, no version numbers, no "this is
absolutix-3.1.2" type comments that have zero information contents.
Now, without any bad examples to follow, nobody has an excuse to import
a port with those kind of comments. :)
Phew! 238 ports modified!
