- Bump PORTREVISION for all ports depending on libglut since the shlib
version number went from 4 to 3.
- Bump PORTREVISION for all ports depending on libXaw as libXaw.so.8 isn't
installed anymore.
- Couple of ports fixes (mostly missing xorg components added to USE_XORG).
Specifically, newer autoconf (> 2.13) has different semantic of the
configure target. In short, one should use --build=CONFIGURE_TARGET
instead of CONFIGURE_TARGET directly. Otherwise, you will get a warning
and the old semantic may be removed in later autoconf releases.
To workaround this issue, many ports hack the CONFIGURE_TARGET variable
so that it contains the ``--build='' prefix.
To solve this issue, under the fact that some ports still have
configure script generated by the old autoconf, we use runtime detection
in the do-configure target so that the proper argument can be used.
Changes to Mk/*:
- Add runtime detection magic in bsd.port.mk
- Remove CONFIGURE_TARGET hack in various bsd.*.mk
- USE_GNOME=gnometarget is now an no-op
Changes to individual ports, other than removing the CONFIGURE_TARGET hack:
= pkg-plist changed (due to the ugly CONFIGURE_TARGET prefix in * executables)
- comms/gnuradio
- science/abinit
- science/elmer-fem
- science/elmer-matc
- science/elmer-meshgen2d
- science/elmerfront
- science/elmerpost
= use x86_64 as ARCH
- devel/g-wrap
= other changes
- print/magicfilter
GNU_CONFIGURE -> HAS_CONFIGURE since it's not generated by autoconf
Total # of ports modified: 1,027
Total # of ports affected: ~7,000 (set GNU_CONFIGURE to yes)
PR: 126524 (obsoletes 52917)
Submitted by: rafan
Tested on: two pointyhat 7-amd64 exp runs (by pav)
Approved by: portmgr (pav)
in bsd.autotools.mk essentially makes this a no-op given that all the
old variables set a USE_AUTOTOOLS_COMPAT variable, which is parsed in
exactly the same way as USE_AUTOTOOLS itself.
Moreover, USE_AUTOTOOLS has already been extensively tested by the GNOME
team -- all GNOME 2.12.x ports use it.
Preliminary documentation can be found at:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/autotools.txt
which is in the process of being SGMLized before introduction into the
Porters Handbook.
Light blue touch-paper. Run.
If you know new email addresses for the people involved, please send-pr it!
<mcsi@agava.com>: host relay.agava.net.ru[195.161.118.3] said: 550
<mcsi@agava.com>: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT
TO command)
<woju@bbsmail.ntu.edu.tw> (expanded from <woju@bbsmail>): Host or domain name
not found. Name service error for name=bbsmail.ntu.edu.tw type=A: Host not
found
<esoha@attbi.com>: host gateway.attbi.com[204.127.198.6] said: 551 not our
customer (in reply to RCPT TO command)
<crow@nektor.hu>: host mail.kapu.hu[195.70.32.236] said: 550 unknown user (in
reply to RCPT TO command)
<cyrilm@tower.pp.ru>: host mail.tower.pp.ru[213.85.109.133] said: 550 unknown
user (in reply to RCPT TO command)
<ports@henrik-motakef.de>: Host or domain name not found. Name service error
for name=henrik-motakef.de type=A: Host not found
<jj@nttmcl.com>: host mx1.nttmcl.com[216.69.64.132] said: 550 5.2.1
<jj@nttmcl.com>... Mailbox disabled for this recipient (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
<koji@jet.es>: host mx.wanadoo.es[62.81.235.75] said: 550 Relay not permitted /
No such user (in reply to RCPT TO command)
<proot@iaces.com>: host horton.iaces.com[204.147.87.98] said: 550 5.1.1
<proot@iaces.com>... User unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command)
<roland.jesse@gmx.net>: host mx0.gmx.net[213.165.64.100] said: 550 5.1.1
{mx034} <roland.jesse@gmx.net>... User is unknown (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
<vess@slavof.net>: host mail.slavof.net[213.130.68.146] said: 550 5.7.1 Access
denied (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
<tuxsuximus@hotmail.com>: host mx3.hotmail.com[65.54.253.99] said: 550
Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
<zenin@archive.rhps.org>: host mail.rhps.org[66.250.128.137] said: 550 5.7.1
<zenin@archive.rhps.org>... Relaying denied (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Begin autotools sanitization sequence by requiring ports to explicitly
specify which version of {libtool,autoconf,automake} they need, erasing
the concept of a "system default".
For ports-in-waiting:
USE_LIBTOOL=YES -> USE_LIBTOOL_VER=13
USE_AUTOCONF=YES -> USE_AUTOCONF_VER=213
USE_AUTOMAKE=YES -> USE_AUTOMAKE_VER=14
Ports attempting to use the old style system after June 1st 2004 will be
sorely disappointed.
