o change package name elm-2.4ME+82 -> elm+ME-2.4.87. previous naming scheme
violates our porting rule.
o add PORTEPOCH not to confuse pkg_version.
o change maintainer.
o add more and more MASTER_SITES.
PR: 24171
Submitted by: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net> (new maintainer)
PLISTs.
Note: I know that this is going to break some symlinks and/or .so
includes, I will back some of these out as I run into these during
package building.
please check out the PLIST!
The port is still IS_INTERACTIVE and NO_PACKAGE, too many questions
asked by the configure script it doesn't seem to make sense to build
a package. If someone with elm knowledge can check this, that will
be great too.
Suggested by: jkh, ache