Fix license commit:

- LICENSE overrides RESTRICTED -> remove RESTRICTED
 - switch to multi-license (LGPL + patents)
 - disallow pkg distribution (as before with RESTRICTED)

Discussed with:	portmgr, jbeich
Triggered by:	PR 230034
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Leidinger 2018-07-27 18:19:21 +00:00
parent 065cb3258f
commit 9babe56829
Notes: svn2git 2021-03-31 03:12:20 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=475450

View File

@ -3,32 +3,34 @@
PORTNAME= lame
PORTVERSION= 3.100
PORTREVISION= 1
CATEGORIES= audio
MASTER_SITES= SF/${PORTNAME:tl}/${PORTNAME:tl}/3.100
MAINTAINER= netchild@FreeBSD.org
COMMENT= Fast MP3 encoder kit
LICENSE= LGPL20+
LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/COPYING
LICENSE= LGPL20+ PATENTS
LICENSE_COMB= multi
LICENSE_FILE_LGPL20= ${WRKSRC}/COPYING
LICENSE_NAME_PATENTS= Intellectual Property Precaution
LICENSE_PERMS_PATENTS= dist-mirror dist-sell no-pkg-mirror no-pkg-sell auto-accept
LICENSE_TEXT_PATENTS= http://www.mp3licensing.com/ only talks about the FhG and Technicolor patent portfolio \
but there are also portfolios from Sisvel (from Philips) and \
Nokia (from AT&T -> Lucent -> Alcatel). \
Some "old" patents are now expired, but there are more recent MP3 patents. Some \
of the more recent ones are multi-channel related, which is not implemented in LAME. \
There was no investigation (in the LAME project) about which patent exists, which \
one is implemented in LAME, and which one is not (yet) expired. As such it is not \
known if LAME could now be distributed as a binary package or not. \
Linux distributions seem to go the "let's see if get sued" way, FreeBSD does not \
follow this.
USES= gmake iconv libtool
USE_LDCONFIG= yes
GNU_CONFIGURE= yes
CONFIGURE_ARGS= --enable-nasm --enable-mp3rtp --disable-gtktest
RESTRICTED= patent issues
# http://www.mp3licensing.com/ only talks about the FhG and Technicolor patent portfolio
# but there are also portfolios from Sisvel (from Philips) and
# Nokia (from AT&T -> Lucent -> Alcatel).
# Some "old" patents are now expired, but there are more recent MP3 patents. Some
# of the more recent ones are multi-channel related, which is not implemented in LAME.
# There was no investigation (in the LAME project) about which patent exists, which
# one is implemented in LAME, and which one is not (yet) expired. As such it is not
# known if LAME could now be distributed as a binary package or not.
# Linux distributions seem to go the "let's see if get sued" way, FreeBSD doesn't
# follow this.
DOC_FILES= API LICENSE README TODO USAGE
OPTIONS_DEFINE= DOCS