Add a patch to fix a problem with very low write speeds with

samba on freebsd.

Following is description made by one of the Samba developers:

"The problem is we switched to using recv() with the MSG_WAITALL flag
instead of read(). This makes Samba faster on most systems. On FreeBSD it
 causes a massive slowdown and I don't know why. To fix it, change
 the definition of MSG_WAITALL to be zero in lib/util_sock.c and
 recompile 2.0.5a. I'm hoping someone from FreeBSD will get back to me
 with some explanation. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team."

This problem where observed by almost all samba-2.0.5a users and typically
 it led to 10-20x decrease in write speed.

PR:		13894
Submitted by:	Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@altavista.net>

net/samba-devel/files/patch-ah

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+--- lib/util_sock.c.orig	Wed Sep 22 10:52:50 1999
++++ lib/util_sock.c	Wed Sep 22 11:30:18 1999
+@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
+ extern int  sslFd;
+ #endif  /* WITH_SSL */
+ 
++#undef MSG_WAITALL
++#define MSG_WAITALL 0
++
+ extern int DEBUGLEVEL;
+ 
+ BOOL passive = False;

net/samba/files/patch-ah

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+--- lib/util_sock.c.orig	Wed Sep 22 10:52:50 1999
++++ lib/util_sock.c	Wed Sep 22 11:30:18 1999
+@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
+ extern int  sslFd;
+ #endif  /* WITH_SSL */
+ 
++#undef MSG_WAITALL
++#define MSG_WAITALL 0
++
+ extern int DEBUGLEVEL;
+ 
+ BOOL passive = False;

net/samba3/files/patch-ah

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+--- lib/util_sock.c.orig	Wed Sep 22 10:52:50 1999
++++ lib/util_sock.c	Wed Sep 22 11:30:18 1999
+@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
+ extern int  sslFd;
+ #endif  /* WITH_SSL */
+ 
++#undef MSG_WAITALL
++#define MSG_WAITALL 0
++
+ extern int DEBUGLEVEL;
+ 
+ BOOL passive = False;