lang/gcc>=11: Warn about LTO_BOOTSTRAP
Warn users about the amount of ram and time needed to build GCC with LTO_BOOTSTRP enabled. PR: 264949 Reported by: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> and others Reviewed by: gerald Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35688
This commit is contained in:
parent
cc65c6b509
commit
320e9debc3
3
lang/gcc11-devel/pkg-help
Normal file
3
lang/gcc11-devel/pkg-help
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|||
Building this port with LTO_BOOTSTRAP enabled requires significant amounts of
|
||||
memory and time. Consider disabling LTO_BOOTSTRAP in favor of STANDARD_BOOTSTRAP
|
||||
(or disabling BOOTSTRAP altogether) in case that is a problem.
|
3
lang/gcc11/pkg-help
Normal file
3
lang/gcc11/pkg-help
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|||
Building this port with LTO_BOOTSTRAP enabled requires significant amounts of
|
||||
memory and time. Consider disabling LTO_BOOTSTRAP in favor of STANDARD_BOOTSTRAP
|
||||
(or disabling BOOTSTRAP altogether) in case that is a problem.
|
3
lang/gcc12-devel/pkg-help
Normal file
3
lang/gcc12-devel/pkg-help
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|||
Building this port with LTO_BOOTSTRAP enabled requires significant amounts of
|
||||
memory and time. Consider disabling LTO_BOOTSTRAP in favor of STANDARD_BOOTSTRAP
|
||||
(or disabling BOOTSTRAP altogether) in case that is a problem.
|
3
lang/gcc12/pkg-help
Normal file
3
lang/gcc12/pkg-help
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|||
Building this port with LTO_BOOTSTRAP enabled requires significant amounts of
|
||||
memory and time. Consider disabling LTO_BOOTSTRAP in favor of STANDARD_BOOTSTRAP
|
||||
(or disabling BOOTSTRAP altogether) in case that is a problem.
|
3
lang/gcc13-devel/pkg-help
Normal file
3
lang/gcc13-devel/pkg-help
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|||
Building this port with LTO_BOOTSTRAP enabled requires significant amounts of
|
||||
memory and time. Consider disabling LTO_BOOTSTRAP in favor of STANDARD_BOOTSTRAP
|
||||
(or disabling BOOTSTRAP altogether) in case that is a problem.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user