freebsd-ports/benchmarks/unixbench/Makefile

# New ports collection makefile for:    bytebench
# Version required:     
# Date created:         28 December 1995
# Whom:                 se
#
# $Id: Makefile,v 1.5 1996/11/18 11:21:48 asami Exp $
#

DISTNAME=       bytebench-3.1
CATEGORIES=	benchmarks
MASTER_SITES=   ftp://ftp.inria.fr/system/benchmark/
EXTRACT_SUFX=	.tar.Z

MAINTAINER=	se@FreeBSD.org

do-install:
		-${MKDIR} $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench
		for f in Makefile README Run doc pgms results testdir; \
			do ${CP} -R $(WRKSRC)/$$f $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench; done
		echo "#!/bin/sh"		   >  $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
		echo "TMPDIR=\$${TMPDIR-/var/tmp}" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
		echo "RESULTDIR=/tmp"		   >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
		echo "export TMPDIR RESULTDIR"	   >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
		echo "cd $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench"  >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
		echo "exec ./Run \"\$$@\""	   >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
		chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench
		chmod 644 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/Makefile
		chmod 644 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/README
		chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/Run
		chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/doc
		chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/pgms
		chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/pgms/*
		chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/results
		chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/testdir

.include <bsd.port.mk>
Add "do-install" target. 1996-01-02 18:08:59 -05:00			`# New ports collection makefile for: bytebench`
The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... 1996-01-01 17:57:36 -05:00			`# Version required:`
			`# Date created: 28 December 1995`
			`# Whom: se`
			`#`
mkdir --> ${MKDIR} cp --> ${CP} rm --> ${RM} 1996-11-19 20:59:27 -05:00			`# $Id: Makefile,v 1.5 1996/11/18 11:21:48 asami Exp $`
The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... 1996-01-01 17:57:36 -05:00			`#`

			`DISTNAME= bytebench-3.1`
Use MAN? macros. CATEGORIES+= -> CATEGORIES. 1996-11-18 06:44:27 -05:00			`CATEGORIES= benchmarks`
The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... 1996-01-01 17:57:36 -05:00			`MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.inria.fr/system/benchmark/`
Use MAN? macros. CATEGORIES+= -> CATEGORIES. 1996-11-18 06:44:27 -05:00			`EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.Z`
The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... 1996-01-01 17:57:36 -05:00
			`MAINTAINER= se@FreeBSD.org`

Add "do-install" target. 1996-01-02 18:08:59 -05:00			`do-install:`
mkdir --> ${MKDIR} cp --> ${CP} rm --> ${RM} 1996-11-19 20:59:27 -05:00			`-${MKDIR} $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench`
Add "do-install" target. 1996-01-02 18:08:59 -05:00			`for f in Makefile README Run doc pgms results testdir; \`
mkdir --> ${MKDIR} cp --> ${CP} rm --> ${RM} 1996-11-19 20:59:27 -05:00			`do ${CP} -R $(WRKSRC)/$$f $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench; done`
Make this run from a R/O /usr file system: - Temporary files are written into $TMPDIR (default /var/tmp) (some 18MB of free space are required for the file system test). - Results are stored into $RESULTDIR (default /tmp). 1996-01-05 11:38:12 -05:00			`echo "#!/bin/sh" > $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
			`echo "TMPDIR=\$${TMPDIR-/var/tmp}" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
			`echo "RESULTDIR=/tmp" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
			`echo "export TMPDIR RESULTDIR" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
			`echo "cd $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
			`echo "exec ./Run \"\$$@\"" >> $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
Add "do-install" target. 1996-01-02 18:08:59 -05:00			`chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/bin/bytebench`
Specify TMPDIR and RESULTDIR outside the /usr tree, or a R/O /usr will prevent the tests from running. 1996-01-02 19:06:21 -05:00			`chmod 644 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/Makefile`
			`chmod 644 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/README`
			`chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/Run`
			`chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/doc`
			`chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/pgms`
			`chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/pgms/*`
			`chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/results`
			`chmod 755 $(PREFIX)/lib/bytebench/testdir`
The BYTE benchmark suite, very popular under Linux users as it seems. (See: http://www.silkroad.com/bass/linux/bm.html for results ...) This is another benchmark that tries to give a single performance number, but without giving much thought to proper weighting of the performance numbers. So: Please handle with care ... 1996-01-01 17:57:36 -05:00
			`.include <bsd.port.mk>`