1
0
mirror of https://gitea.com/gitea/tea.git synced 2024-06-16 06:25:25 +00:00
tea/modules/interact/pull_review.go
Norwin 78a95f1ca4 Allow editing multiline prompts with external text editor (#429)
- Adds a new `Preferences` struct to the config, initially only containing `Editor: bool (default false)`.
  This struct will be serialized to configs once there is a first tea induced change to the config (eg `tea login default <name>` or `tea login add`).
- Use external editor for all multiline prompts if preferred.

We already had a function for starting a texteditor for diff reviews; it does not really make sense to replace it with `survey.Editor`, as there is a big interface mismatch: survey expects strings as inputs, while our diff functions operate on files,

fixes #424

Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/429
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
2021-10-14 22:36:08 +08:00

87 lines
2.6 KiB
Go

// Copyright 2020 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a MIT-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package interact
import (
"fmt"
"os"
"code.gitea.io/tea/modules/config"
"code.gitea.io/tea/modules/context"
"code.gitea.io/tea/modules/task"
"code.gitea.io/sdk/gitea"
"github.com/AlecAivazis/survey/v2"
)
var reviewStates = map[string]gitea.ReviewStateType{
"approve": gitea.ReviewStateApproved,
"comment": gitea.ReviewStateComment,
"request changes": gitea.ReviewStateRequestChanges,
}
var reviewStateOptions = []string{"comment", "request changes", "approve"}
// ReviewPull interactively reviews a PR
func ReviewPull(ctx *context.TeaContext, idx int64) error {
var state gitea.ReviewStateType
var comment string
var codeComments []gitea.CreatePullReviewComment
var err error
// codeComments
var reviewDiff bool
promptDiff := &survey.Confirm{Message: "Review / comment the diff?", Default: true}
if err = survey.AskOne(promptDiff, &reviewDiff); err != nil {
return err
}
if reviewDiff {
if codeComments, err = DoDiffReview(ctx, idx); err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Error during diff review: %s\n", err)
}
fmt.Printf("Found %d code comments in your review\n", len(codeComments))
}
// state
var stateString string
promptState := &survey.Select{Message: "Your assessment:", Options: reviewStateOptions, VimMode: true}
if err = survey.AskOne(promptState, &stateString); err != nil {
return err
}
state = reviewStates[stateString]
// comment
var promptOpts survey.AskOpt
if (state == gitea.ReviewStateComment && len(codeComments) == 0) || state == gitea.ReviewStateRequestChanges {
promptOpts = survey.WithValidator(survey.Required)
}
err = survey.AskOne(NewMultiline(Multiline{
Message: "Concluding comment:",
Syntax: "md",
UseEditor: config.GetPreferences().Editor,
}), &comment, promptOpts)
if err != nil {
return err
}
return task.CreatePullReview(ctx, idx, state, comment, codeComments)
}
// DoDiffReview (1) fetches & saves diff in tempfile, (2) starts $VISUAL or $EDITOR to comment on diff,
// (3) parses resulting file into code comments.
// It doesn't really make sense to use survey.Editor() here, as we'd read the file content at least twice.
func DoDiffReview(ctx *context.TeaContext, idx int64) ([]gitea.CreatePullReviewComment, error) {
tmpFile, err := task.SavePullDiff(ctx, idx)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
defer os.Remove(tmpFile)
if err = task.OpenFileInEditor(tmpFile); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return task.ParseDiffComments(tmpFile)
}