The memory leak happens when a presence is received for a MUC room. The
JID is not present in the roster, so updating its status is ignored. We
have to free resource in this case, because it has no owner and is lost
otherwise.
==25736== 47 (32 direct, 15 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,625 of 3,399
==25736== at 0x4A330FF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:309)
==25736== by 0x13A962: resource_new (resource.c:47)
==25736== by 0x145501: _available_handler (presence.c:665)
==25736== by 0x145501: _presence_handler (presence.c:399)
==25736== by 0x145501: _presence_handler (presence.c:358)
==25736== by 0x80D5F34: handler_fire_stanza (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x80D2B49: _handle_stream_stanza (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x80E15CE: _end_element (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x843EE9B: doContent (in /usr/lib64/libexpat.so.1.6.10)
==25736== by 0x843F94B: contentProcessor (in /usr/lib64/libexpat.so.1.6.10)
==25736== by 0x8441E77: XML_ParseBuffer (in /usr/lib64/libexpat.so.1.6.10)
==25736== by 0x80D586B: xmpp_run_once (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x13E07E: connection_check_events (connection.c:119)
==25736== by 0x13869C: prof_run (profanity.c:129)
Fixes#1279.
We use the same incoming function as for regular incoming text here. But
don't want to filter out our own messages since we didn't print them
during sending.
Follow up to 8ee2cdadc8
`/logging group color` has:
* `unanimous` which will color it with one unanimous color. Like it was
done always.
* `regular` which colors it like regular incoming messages.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1261
* Add .builds/openbsd.yml for builds.sr.ht
* Update travis-build.sh -> ci-build.sh with OpenBSD case
* Fix libdl check in configure.ac (OpenBSD has libdl built-in)
* Fix some minor issues found when compiling on OpenBSD with GCC (e.g.
uninitialized variables)
If we are connected with another client and send a message, then correct
it. We now display it correctly in Profanity.
Id wasn't saved for carbon copied messages too so far.
So far receipts are only send if we have enabled it and the other client
supports it.
But it could be that the other person is connected with several clients.
One supporting it and the other which doesn't. If the not supporting one
is active and we send to a fulljid, then we won't get receipts.
Probably it's best to just always send them if they are enabled in
Profanity. And not try to find out the capabilities of the other client.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1268
