Only when we start the conversation.
Not yet when we get messaged and a new window is opened.
Need to have sorting of messages in the window buffer then, I guess.
Also MAM IQ should only be send one time in such a case.
If MAM is enabled history from sql backend will not be shown.
`mam` in profrc enables experimental MAM.
Can change soon again. Don't rely on stuff in this stage ;)
Later we will have several options.
Getting everything since last timestamp (if none everything at all).
Getting everything since today + configure time (1 week).
Should also have a reload all command like conversations once you
cleared the history.
All MAM messages should be written into sql db.
And then probably displayed from there so that regular history works
too.
MAM messages don't have a type nor a from.
If we detect a message without type let's log it and exit without
continuing to try to parse it.
Otherwise we go into _handle_chat() and crash on the no from.
The function creates a form to find such strings as software, os, etc.
It remembers the strings allocated by form_create() and use them below
in caps_create(). The issue is that the form is destroyed before and as
result the strings are freed too.
As solution, allocate own copy of strings.
Otherwise we print the freshly received message to the window twice.
Once when receiving (and immediately printing), then logging it, and
then again when we print the last 10 log entries.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1305
Use g_date_time_format() instead of g_date_time_format_iso8601() to only
rely on glib 2.56.0 which is the latest version in Debian Buster
(current stable).
We also only use basic sqlite functions so 3.27.0 should be fine there
(also the one in Debian buster).
Thanks to @DebXWoody.
We now dont get the log files from the text files via chat_log_get_previous() anymore.
We use the sql backend via log_database_get_previous_chat().
So far it just has the same behaviour like chat_log_get_previous(),
except that in _chatwin_history() we don't pass the sender to
win_print_history() which should be fixed in a commit soon.
And log_database_get_previous_chat() can later easily be expanded to fix
https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/205.
Maybe if we only use `/connect` we dont have ProfAccount. In that case
we won't log anything. Only if a account is used we log.
If this is the case or the init of the db didn't work we still want
profanity to run but wont log anything to the db.
Timestamps are only set if a message is delayed.
If none is set let's set it upon recaival so we don't have to set it
when it gets displayed.
This means we will also have it for logs etc in the ProfMessage.
I plan to save all messages in an SQLite db.
For retrieving information it's nicer than having it in a text file.
We will have more info in there and easier to parse it.
This will also be good for later MAM
(https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/660).
Regular text files will still be an option for users so that they can
easily grep them and do whatever they like.
Internally Profanity will only use the SQLite db.
xmpp_stanza_add_child() takes own reference to the child stanza.
Therefore we have to release our reference or the child is lost
and not freed otherwise.
The memory leak happens when a presence is received for a MUC room. The
JID is not present in the roster, so updating its status is ignored. We
have to free resource in this case, because it has no owner and is lost
otherwise.
==25736== 47 (32 direct, 15 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,625 of 3,399
==25736== at 0x4A330FF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:309)
==25736== by 0x13A962: resource_new (resource.c:47)
==25736== by 0x145501: _available_handler (presence.c:665)
==25736== by 0x145501: _presence_handler (presence.c:399)
==25736== by 0x145501: _presence_handler (presence.c:358)
==25736== by 0x80D5F34: handler_fire_stanza (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x80D2B49: _handle_stream_stanza (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x80E15CE: _end_element (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x843EE9B: doContent (in /usr/lib64/libexpat.so.1.6.10)
==25736== by 0x843F94B: contentProcessor (in /usr/lib64/libexpat.so.1.6.10)
==25736== by 0x8441E77: XML_ParseBuffer (in /usr/lib64/libexpat.so.1.6.10)
==25736== by 0x80D586B: xmpp_run_once (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x13E07E: connection_check_events (connection.c:119)
==25736== by 0x13869C: prof_run (profanity.c:129)
Fixes#1279.
Some users might want there nick to always stay white (etc) for easier
recognition.
Now we can do `/color own off` to not generate the color based on
xep-0392. The `me=` color (etc) from the theme will then be used.
Once we run this command `theme_load()` is called again.
And the theme looks totally wrong.
We encountered this at other times already and I think it's nothing
wrong with this new code here now but that there seems to be a missing
closing attr for the color when drawing.
Should be investigated seperately.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1288
Most clients have them enabled by default already for a smoother modern XMPP experience.
Enable by default: allowing message corrections, sending of read
receipts, enabling carbons, typing/chat states.
If users input strange stuff and we can't create a jid from it even the
setting is set to 'user' we still should fallback to the regular
identifer.
For example with `/msg @name%matrix.domain.org@matrix.org hi`.
win_println_incoming_muc_msg() always used the current time. Now let's
use whatever is sent int he message struct (from the delay stanza or
the current time that we set now once the message is received).
No playing with the time upon display anymore.
I suspect this was just a copy paste error.
`_win_create_simple_layout()` is called in other creation functions like
`win_create_config()` or `win_create_private()`.
I suspect when `win_create_muc()` was created it was just copied. But in
this function we actually set the layout ourself later.
So calling the function isn't needed.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1279
We use the same incoming function as for regular incoming text here. But
don't want to filter out our own messages since we didn't print them
during sending.
Follow up to 8ee2cdadc8
`/logging group color` has:
* `unanimous` which will color it with one unanimous color. Like it was
done always.
* `regular` which colors it like regular incoming messages.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1261
* Add .builds/openbsd.yml for builds.sr.ht
* Update travis-build.sh -> ci-build.sh with OpenBSD case
* Fix libdl check in configure.ac (OpenBSD has libdl built-in)
* Fix some minor issues found when compiling on OpenBSD with GCC (e.g.
uninitialized variables)
If we are connected with another client and send a message, then correct
it. We now display it correctly in Profanity.
Id wasn't saved for carbon copied messages too so far.
So far receipts are only send if we have enabled it and the other client
supports it.
But it could be that the other person is connected with several clients.
One supporting it and the other which doesn't. If the not supporting one
is active and we send to a fulljid, then we won't get receipts.
Probably it's best to just always send them if they are enabled in
Profanity. And not try to find out the capabilities of the other client.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1268
In aa3693daa211b36c78d136d5a1ee9f3258e21352 I renamed
`win_println_me_message()` -> `win_print_outgoing_muc_msg()`.
Now: `win_println_them_message()` -> `win_println_incoming_muc_msg()`
to be more consistent and descriptive.
XEP-0308 Version 1.1.0 (2019-05-15) states "It is expected that clients will not send message corrections to clients that do not support them, as non-supporting clients will render these as duplicate (corrected) messages"
```
10:12:47 - jubalh: Do clients actually check whether other clients support xep0308 (LMC) before sending?
10:13:13 - pep.: not poezio, and I doubt anybody does. it's the "but carbons/MAM" argument
10:13:49 - jubalh: Profanity doesnt support this yet. So I always get the message twice. One time the message, and then the corrected ones. And I think that's right. But I understood xep0308 correctly it sais a
client shouldnt sent a message with 'replace' if the client doesnt support it? I don't see why
10:14:50 - Ge0rG: jubalh: because you might also use Conversations and read the backlog from MAM on conversations
10:15:51 - jubalh: Ge0rG: sorry?
10:16:36 - Ge0rG: jubalh: when I'm sending you a message, I don't know which client you'll use to read it. So it doesn't make sense to limit the features I use
10:27:57 - jubalh: Yes. That's why I'm confused by thestatement in the XEP
10:28:13 - jubalh: "It is expected that clients will not send message corrections to clients that do not support them, as non-supporting clients will render these as duplicate (corrected) messages. "
10:28:37 - Holger: Yes, you're both saying the same thing. And yes I agree, that part of the XEP is nonsense. We have that "check whether the peer's client supports it" stuff in various XEPs that depend on
recipient's features and it never makes sense as it doesn't cope with multi-device, MAM, groupchat.
10:28:53 - jubalh: First: You don't know if he is connected with several clients. Some supporting it and some not. Second: Why not just resend the new corrected message? Then he has both messages and no
information is lost. If he only gets the first one information is lost
10:29:20 - jubalh: Okay
10:29:30 - jubalh: Then I won't implement it this way. Thanks guys!
10:29:34 - Holger: Well UX is a bit meh if the recipient doesn't support it (I'm an MCabber user and know what I'm talking about) but I see no better solution, yes.
```
So it makes more sense to just always send it. Non supporting clients will then get the message and the corrected message. So they get it "twice". Which is the right thing to do in my opinion.
_win_print() and _win_printf() sound like they are the same. But
actually they are something totally different.
I renamed _win_print() to _win_print_internal() for that reason. It's
more about actually drawing to the ncurses window.
_win_printf() calls _win_print() and also writes the text to the window
buffer. Which _win_print() didn't, it was really just the ncurses
specific things.
In some cases there is _win_print_internal() called after a
buffer_append() in those cases it might be more correct to actually call
_win_printf().
It was not done so far. But probably is better. But will mean a bit more
operations.
I'll have to check this later.
So far the correction is sent. But the UI in Profanity itself is not
updated.
Also autocompletion for `/correct` with the last sent message is
missing.
I think both the window and the buffer should also be cleared in case
`/clear` is issue and persist_history is off.
Otherwise it could happen that win_redraw() redraws the whole content of
the buffer again.
So far we saved the timestamp which also had the `from`.
But we need this only to find out whether it's MUC history.
For displaying we should use the oldest delay timestamp.
Also in
61f66966dd (diff-4926fd4577a336bd3eb240f8104a5c5bL837)
a error was introduced.
Before we saved the timestamp in all cases. And only if timestamp AND
from was given we went into MUC history case.
Normal timestamp saving was not done anymore only if it also had a from
attribute.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1254
So far we got the first delay with a from that comes from the server.
This way we know it's MUC history.
Now we take the first time stamp we actually find. Which is likely the
one being added first. And should contain the correct time to display.
It would be nicer to actually compare the dates though.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1254
Cannot be configured for now.
Can be set via `adv.notify.discoversion` in the `notification` section.
Will notify about version requests via XEP-0092 and XEP-0232.
Client version can still be seen via caps (capabilities).
See `stanza_attach_caps()`.
