If users input strange stuff and we can't create a jid from it even the
setting is set to 'user' we still should fallback to the regular
identifer.
For example with `/msg @name%matrix.domain.org@matrix.org hi`.
win_println_incoming_muc_msg() always used the current time. Now let's
use whatever is sent int he message struct (from the delay stanza or
the current time that we set now once the message is received).
No playing with the time upon display anymore.
I suspect this was just a copy paste error.
`_win_create_simple_layout()` is called in other creation functions like
`win_create_config()` or `win_create_private()`.
I suspect when `win_create_muc()` was created it was just copied. But in
this function we actually set the layout ourself later.
So calling the function isn't needed.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1279
The memory leak happens when a presence is received for a MUC room. The
JID is not present in the roster, so updating its status is ignored. We
have to free resource in this case, because it has no owner and is lost
otherwise.
==25736== 47 (32 direct, 15 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,625 of 3,399
==25736== at 0x4A330FF: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:309)
==25736== by 0x13A962: resource_new (resource.c:47)
==25736== by 0x145501: _available_handler (presence.c:665)
==25736== by 0x145501: _presence_handler (presence.c:399)
==25736== by 0x145501: _presence_handler (presence.c:358)
==25736== by 0x80D5F34: handler_fire_stanza (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x80D2B49: _handle_stream_stanza (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x80E15CE: _end_element (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x843EE9B: doContent (in /usr/lib64/libexpat.so.1.6.10)
==25736== by 0x843F94B: contentProcessor (in /usr/lib64/libexpat.so.1.6.10)
==25736== by 0x8441E77: XML_ParseBuffer (in /usr/lib64/libexpat.so.1.6.10)
==25736== by 0x80D586B: xmpp_run_once (in /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.0.0.0)
==25736== by 0x13E07E: connection_check_events (connection.c:119)
==25736== by 0x13869C: prof_run (profanity.c:129)
Fixes#1279.
We use the same incoming function as for regular incoming text here. But
don't want to filter out our own messages since we didn't print them
during sending.
Follow up to 8ee2cdadc8
`/logging group color` has:
* `unanimous` which will color it with one unanimous color. Like it was
done always.
* `regular` which colors it like regular incoming messages.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1261
