1f8b1eb740 made it possible to have utf8 chars as correction chars. So since then prefs_get_correction_char() doesn't return a regular char but a char*.
Seems like there was an oversight that we need to use %s then.
For some time users could choose to have the old way "unanimous" where
all the MUC history is just grey (or whatever was set). Now it is always
just displayed like regular new incoming MUC text.
glib functions can allocate a GError object that must be freed with
g_error_free(). Otherwise a memory leak happens.
There are similar unfixed places in omemo, check:
grep "&error" src/omemo/omemo.c
Fixes#1304.
MUCPMs and regular chat messages get printed with the same code.
But we don't save MUC PMs in the sqldb, because another jid could use
the same nick the next time.
And if we would take the log out we would need a different routine,
checking for resourcepart too.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1312
Only when we start the conversation.
Not yet when we get messaged and a new window is opened.
Need to have sorting of messages in the window buffer then, I guess.
Also MAM IQ should only be send one time in such a case.
If MAM is enabled history from sql backend will not be shown.
`mam` in profrc enables experimental MAM.
Can change soon again. Don't rely on stuff in this stage ;)
We now dont get the log files from the text files via chat_log_get_previous() anymore.
We use the sql backend via log_database_get_previous_chat().
So far it just has the same behaviour like chat_log_get_previous(),
except that in _chatwin_history() we don't pass the sender to
win_print_history() which should be fixed in a commit soon.
And log_database_get_previous_chat() can later easily be expanded to fix
https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/205.
Some users might want there nick to always stay white (etc) for easier
recognition.
Now we can do `/color own off` to not generate the color based on
xep-0392. The `me=` color (etc) from the theme will then be used.
Once we run this command `theme_load()` is called again.
And the theme looks totally wrong.
We encountered this at other times already and I think it's nothing
wrong with this new code here now but that there seems to be a missing
closing attr for the color when drawing.
Should be investigated seperately.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1288
If users input strange stuff and we can't create a jid from it even the
setting is set to 'user' we still should fallback to the regular
identifer.
For example with `/msg @name%matrix.domain.org@matrix.org hi`.
win_println_incoming_muc_msg() always used the current time. Now let's
use whatever is sent int he message struct (from the delay stanza or
the current time that we set now once the message is received).
No playing with the time upon display anymore.
I suspect this was just a copy paste error.
`_win_create_simple_layout()` is called in other creation functions like
`win_create_config()` or `win_create_private()`.
I suspect when `win_create_muc()` was created it was just copied. But in
this function we actually set the layout ourself later.
So calling the function isn't needed.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1279
We use the same incoming function as for regular incoming text here. But
don't want to filter out our own messages since we didn't print them
during sending.
Follow up to 8ee2cdadc8
`/logging group color` has:
* `unanimous` which will color it with one unanimous color. Like it was
done always.
* `regular` which colors it like regular incoming messages.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1261
* Add .builds/openbsd.yml for builds.sr.ht
* Update travis-build.sh -> ci-build.sh with OpenBSD case
* Fix libdl check in configure.ac (OpenBSD has libdl built-in)
* Fix some minor issues found when compiling on OpenBSD with GCC (e.g.
uninitialized variables)
If we are connected with another client and send a message, then correct
it. We now display it correctly in Profanity.
Id wasn't saved for carbon copied messages too so far.
In aa3693daa211b36c78d136d5a1ee9f3258e21352 I renamed
`win_println_me_message()` -> `win_print_outgoing_muc_msg()`.
Now: `win_println_them_message()` -> `win_println_incoming_muc_msg()`
to be more consistent and descriptive.
_win_print() and _win_printf() sound like they are the same. But
actually they are something totally different.
I renamed _win_print() to _win_print_internal() for that reason. It's
more about actually drawing to the ncurses window.
_win_printf() calls _win_print() and also writes the text to the window
buffer. Which _win_print() didn't, it was really just the ncurses
specific things.
In some cases there is _win_print_internal() called after a
buffer_append() in those cases it might be more correct to actually call
_win_printf().
It was not done so far. But probably is better. But will mean a bit more
operations.
I'll have to check this later.
So far the correction is sent. But the UI in Profanity itself is not
updated.
Also autocompletion for `/correct` with the last sent message is
missing.
I think both the window and the buffer should also be cleared in case
`/clear` is issue and persist_history is off.
Otherwise it could happen that win_redraw() redraws the whole content of
the buffer again.
`/roster room use name` to use the name of the MUC in the roster list.
`/roster room use jid` to use the jid of the MUC in the roster list.
Display it only in case `/roster room by none` is set so far.
So far we printed one after the last received message, which doesn't
make much sense of course.
Now only print one if there is not already one present.
This is because the actual command that parses itself (cmd_logging) returns false if it didn't get the expected parameters.
Handing the printing however is done by another function. This function is added to the Command struct as setting_function.
So if this is set, and the actual command returns false. We should just call the setting_function and not print the error message.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1237
The last 3 commits added basic support.
Thanks @aaptel!
This commit adds basic settings interface to use it.
See `/color on|off`.
We still have to enable settings for color blindness.
And maybe another setting to decide whether to color the
occupantslist/roster with the same algo.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1191
* add theme_hash_attrs()
* when printing a user message check PREF_COLOR_NICK to decide whether
to colorize it or not
ideally we should hash the jid instead of the nick but this is already
a first step.
From @xaizek s comment on issue #1235:
```
If the move would cause the window to be off the screen, it is an error and the window
is not moved.
Resize on the other hand doesn't fail like this according to its documentation. So new size needs to be applied first.
```
Big thanks to @xaizek for taking a look at our code and helping us!!
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1235
This is encountered when biboumi is used.
Example: `/join #debian-next%irc.oftc.net@biboumi.lebihan.pl`
It seems then time can be null.
g_date_time_format() will not work in this case although time_pref will
not be "off". So let's not call g_date_time_format() in this case. But
treat it like time is set to off.
However message reflection will not work properly with biboumi.
Probably we dont get origin-id.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1230
`/invite <contact>` became `/invite send <contact>.
`/invites` became `/invite list`.
`/decline` became `/invite decline`.
Accept is still done via `/join`.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1116
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/200
This doesn't work yet. And I have no idea why.
Weird behaviour:
- start profanity
- type 'ASDF'
- ctrl+arrow down
-> text vanishes (like intended)
- arrow up
-> nothing happens (intended is that the last history item [ASDF]
appears)
- type 'ABC'
- press enter
- arrow up
-> ABC appears
- enter
- type 'UUU'
- ctrl+arrow down
- type 'ZZZ'
- enter
- arrow up
- ZZZ appears
- arrow up
- UUU appears
So in the latter case we added to history and deleted from the input
line and then immediately entered new text and pressed enter, to add
this to the history too.
When we do this the not sent text succesfully was stored in history.
XEP-0184: Message Delivery Receipts, *requires* the id attribute.
Generally this is not the case.
For this reason the id was only present in the DeliveryReceipt struct
since it was only used for XEP-0184.
For https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/660 XEP-0313 MAM
and https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/805 XEP-0308 Last Message Correction
we will also need the id.
So in preparation for further work let's move the id to the general
ProfBuffEntry.
We will need to adapt code so that we actually always write the ID if we
receive one.
Profanity sends the same value for both. Other clients might not.
Safe both since we could need them later.
Once we implement Last Message Correction we will need the regular id.
If we override it with origin-id and another client chooses to not use
the same value for id and origin-id then we can't interpret the id sent
with the LMC request correctly.
For OMEMO we had a list with our sent messages.
It was used so that we don't decrypt our own messages in MUCs that come
in via reflection.
Recently for https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/pull/1209 we
started to use origin-id and use an algorithm so we can detect our own
sent messages via checking origin-id.
Profanity uses the same id for the message ID and origin-id.
With 06f300a42c we added the
message_is_sent_by_us() function.
We implemented XEP-0359 this way to fix
https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1201 so that we don't
log our own messages in MUCs twice.
We can now check whether the message was sent by us using this function
and can get rid of the list.
Probably we could also put many parts of the sv_ev_room_message()
function inside (else) part of `if (!(g_strcmp0(mynick,
message->jid->resourcepart) == 0 && message_is_sent_by_us(message))) {`.
Have to look more closely whether any of this needs to be run in case
the message actually comes from us.
