Messages would get duplicated when you chat with yourself, worse if you
had omemo enabled the duplicated message would say something along the
lines of "Your client doesn't support OMEMO". The cause was carbons
when the message was sent from another client, whilst it was a sent
and received message when profanity was the one to send it. This commit
ignores the carbon message in the 1st case and ignores the received one
in the 2nd.
Fixes https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1595
Muc configuration in profanity used to not update until next login, ie:
make muc non_anonymous and members_only but be unable to start omemo
until next login. Now a disco info request is sent after forrm submit
and chatroom details are changed accordingly.
Fixes https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1347
We only want to have the decrypted message or the alternative body in
message->plain.
Also let's print error messages if it makes sense and log other issues.
Partly addresses the commit in the comit mesage of:
2dc0cc489c
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1693
```
@StefanKropp @DebXWoody please check `_handle_ox_chat()` I don't
understand what you are doing there.
1)
First plain is assigned `message->plain =
p_ox_gpg_decrypt(xmpp_stanza_get_text(ox));`
and then in the same if block you overwrite this with `message->plain =
xmpp_stanza_get_text(b);` without freeing the old value as far as I can
see.
2)
Sometimes even doing `message->plain = "OX error: No payload found";`.
Shouldn't there be a `strdup()`? I think later on we try to free the
whole message struct. So we can't mix this static things.
```
Like mentioned on the review at
https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/pull/1605 I don't ge why
@DebXWoody changed the code like he did.
I changed it to something that made more sense to me now.
Instead of looking for headline in two places and checking for pubsub in
a headline place (only).
I didn't check this deeply. And still have a feeling that this is not
the best way to go. But I didn't read the XEP yet.
Added a TODO to the code regarding this too.
A quick skimming through https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0107.html
doesn't show me anything regarding headline. So I really don't see why
this needs to go here.
Hopefully @DebXWoody checks this in the future. But since he didn't
react on the PR I decided to make some adjustments myself so we can
merge it.
We came into the carbons checking code when we received `<private
xmlns="urn:xmpp:carbons:2"/>`. Which actually marks a message to _not_
be a carbon.
In this code we also make sure that carbons only come from us.
If not we don't call the message handler code.
So we should actually only check for `<sent xmlns='urn:xmpp:carbons:2'>`
and `<received xmlns='urn:xmpp:carbons:2'>`.
Thanks pukkamustard and Holger.
Fixes https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1614
The most loggings has been set to debug. Just in case of error / problem the
logging should be done with log-level ERROR or WARNING.
We will see later, which loggings should be switched to log-level INFO.
This improvement has been done to find OMEMO bugs.
See also: #1070#1530#1538
It was a great ride!
IDs look instead of
`TE5BTDc2ZTc3YTMwZGU3MDgzMzllOTliNGExNjVmMjZkMTY1ZmUyZGEyNTUxMjVmODBkMmQzOGMxYWI2ZjAxNzdiM2Q=`
more like `7HcnNSoO1MVvb0p9a9e293152922853e910b8b1a65bb26e225a0568` now.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1520
We still has our identifier into it to filter MUC reflected messages.
profident maybe should be changed to be longer or be generated upon each
start.
There was a todo for this in message.c which got forgotten.
This was most likely also the reason why there were NULL entries for
this in the DB which DebXWoody mentioned in the MUC.
Thus comparison was with NULL and no new entries were added to the
database.
Edit:
After checking pull requests I see Stefans draft PR:
https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/pull/1505
So let's add him as co-author.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Kropp <stefan@debxwoody.de>
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1435
So far we didn't print the error if it contained `<error
type="cancel">`. It appears that the code always thought this is a
service-not-available (so one is either blocked or the account doesn't
exist) and printed `Recipient not found`.
But there can be other errors as well. Like in above mentioned issue
`not-allowed`.
Let's just print the text.
In case of the cancel type we still remove the jid from the chat
sessions. I'm not entirely sure whether this needs to be done in other
cases too.
