XEP-0308 Version 1.1.0 (2019-05-15) states "It is expected that clients will not send message corrections to clients that do not support them, as non-supporting clients will render these as duplicate (corrected) messages"
```
10:12:47 - jubalh: Do clients actually check whether other clients support xep0308 (LMC) before sending?
10:13:13 - pep.: not poezio, and I doubt anybody does. it's the "but carbons/MAM" argument
10:13:49 - jubalh: Profanity doesnt support this yet. So I always get the message twice. One time the message, and then the corrected ones. And I think that's right. But I understood xep0308 correctly it sais a
client shouldnt sent a message with 'replace' if the client doesnt support it? I don't see why
10:14:50 - Ge0rG: jubalh: because you might also use Conversations and read the backlog from MAM on conversations
10:15:51 - jubalh: Ge0rG: sorry?
10:16:36 - Ge0rG: jubalh: when I'm sending you a message, I don't know which client you'll use to read it. So it doesn't make sense to limit the features I use
10:27:57 - jubalh: Yes. That's why I'm confused by thestatement in the XEP
10:28:13 - jubalh: "It is expected that clients will not send message corrections to clients that do not support them, as non-supporting clients will render these as duplicate (corrected) messages. "
10:28:37 - Holger: Yes, you're both saying the same thing. And yes I agree, that part of the XEP is nonsense. We have that "check whether the peer's client supports it" stuff in various XEPs that depend on
recipient's features and it never makes sense as it doesn't cope with multi-device, MAM, groupchat.
10:28:53 - jubalh: First: You don't know if he is connected with several clients. Some supporting it and some not. Second: Why not just resend the new corrected message? Then he has both messages and no
information is lost. If he only gets the first one information is lost
10:29:20 - jubalh: Okay
10:29:30 - jubalh: Then I won't implement it this way. Thanks guys!
10:29:34 - Holger: Well UX is a bit meh if the recipient doesn't support it (I'm an MCabber user and know what I'm talking about) but I see no better solution, yes.
```
So it makes more sense to just always send it. Non supporting clients will then get the message and the corrected message. So they get it "twice". Which is the right thing to do in my opinion.
So far the correction is sent. But the UI in Profanity itself is not
updated.
Also autocompletion for `/correct` with the last sent message is
missing.
`/roster room use name` to use the name of the MUC in the roster list.
`/roster room use jid` to use the jid of the MUC in the roster list.
Display it only in case `/roster room by none` is set so far.
The last 3 commits added basic support.
Thanks @aaptel!
This commit adds basic settings interface to use it.
See `/color on|off`.
We still have to enable settings for color blindness.
And maybe another setting to decide whether to color the
occupantslist/roster with the same algo.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1191
Before we had `/online`, `/away`, `/dnd`, `/chat`, `/xa`.
These commands are no longer available.
We have `/status set online` etc now.
Before `/status` was used to get the status of a contact.
This now moved to `/status get`.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1116
`/invite <contact>` became `/invite send <contact>.
`/invites` became `/invite list`.
`/decline` became `/invite decline`.
Accept is still done via `/join`.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1116
Additionally to `/resource titlebar on` we now allow the setting via
/titlebar show|hide resource` since it's about the titlebar.
But makes sense to have it in `/resource` too because there is
`/resource message on|off` too. And this one doesnt have an setting of
it's own.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1116
Previously we had `/tls show on|off` to manipulate the UI setting for
the title bar. To decide whether to show TLS info there or not.
This should go into `/titlebar`.
Now we have `/titlebar show|hide tls` for this.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1116
room is either argv[0] or allocated by GString. We have to free memory
in the 2nd case. Replace argv[0] with g_strdup(argv[0]) in order to
make unconditional g_free().
