Gajim sends \u200E and \u200F for RTL.
It is planned that Gajim stops doing this and uses some GTK feature to
get the same result.
However users expressed the whish that we filter out such characters in
incoming messages before displaying them to make Profanity more robust.
I'm still not sure whether I like the solution because it means a lot of
allocating/deallocating upon every new message.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1220
The problem is that in _handle_groupchat() we look for
STANZA_NS_STABLE_ID which will result in origin-id or stanza-id.
It seems like prosody servers send origin-id first, so this worked in
all my tests. But actually we cannot be sure of the order.
So far we stopped after the first element was found.
I only found xmpp_stanza_get_child_by_ns() and
xmpp_stanza_get_child_by_name() in libstrophe. But we need a combination
of both.
So I created stanza_get_child_by_name_and_ns() for Profanity. I need to
remember to upstream this to libstrophe later (if they really don't have
such a function).
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1223
Before we had `/online`, `/away`, `/dnd`, `/chat`, `/xa`.
These commands are no longer available.
We have `/status set online` etc now.
Before `/status` was used to get the status of a contact.
This now moved to `/status get`.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1116
`/invite <contact>` became `/invite send <contact>.
`/invites` became `/invite list`.
`/decline` became `/invite decline`.
Accept is still done via `/join`.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1116
Additionally to `/resource titlebar on` we now allow the setting via
/titlebar show|hide resource` since it's about the titlebar.
But makes sense to have it in `/resource` too because there is
`/resource message on|off` too. And this one doesnt have an setting of
it's own.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1116
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/200
This doesn't work yet. And I have no idea why.
Weird behaviour:
- start profanity
- type 'ASDF'
- ctrl+arrow down
-> text vanishes (like intended)
- arrow up
-> nothing happens (intended is that the last history item [ASDF]
appears)
- type 'ABC'
- press enter
- arrow up
-> ABC appears
- enter
- type 'UUU'
- ctrl+arrow down
- type 'ZZZ'
- enter
- arrow up
- ZZZ appears
- arrow up
- UUU appears
So in the latter case we added to history and deleted from the input
line and then immediately entered new text and pressed enter, to add
this to the history too.
When we do this the not sent text succesfully was stored in history.
Previously we had `/tls show on|off` to manipulate the UI setting for
the title bar. To decide whether to show TLS info there or not.
This should go into `/titlebar`.
Now we have `/titlebar show|hide tls` for this.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1116
XEP-0184: Message Delivery Receipts, *requires* the id attribute.
Generally this is not the case.
For this reason the id was only present in the DeliveryReceipt struct
since it was only used for XEP-0184.
For https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/660 XEP-0313 MAM
and https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/805 XEP-0308 Last Message Correction
we will also need the id.
So in preparation for further work let's move the id to the general
ProfBuffEntry.
We will need to adapt code so that we actually always write the ID if we
receive one.
Profanity sends the same value for both. Other clients might not.
Safe both since we could need them later.
Once we implement Last Message Correction we will need the regular id.
If we override it with origin-id and another client chooses to not use
the same value for id and origin-id then we can't interpret the id sent
with the LMC request correctly.
For OMEMO we had a list with our sent messages.
It was used so that we don't decrypt our own messages in MUCs that come
in via reflection.
Recently for https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/pull/1209 we
started to use origin-id and use an algorithm so we can detect our own
sent messages via checking origin-id.
Profanity uses the same id for the message ID and origin-id.
With 06f300a42c we added the
message_is_sent_by_us() function.
We implemented XEP-0359 this way to fix
https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1201 so that we don't
log our own messages in MUCs twice.
We can now check whether the message was sent by us using this function
and can get rid of the list.
Probably we could also put many parts of the sv_ev_room_message()
function inside (else) part of `if (!(g_strcmp0(mynick,
message->jid->resourcepart) == 0 && message_is_sent_by_us(message))) {`.
Have to look more closely whether any of this needs to be run in case
the message actually comes from us.
Some clients (eg. PSI) are sending the stanzas delimited by whitespace
text nodes, which will fail while looping through the <prekeys/>
children and also print weird errors when iterating through the <list/>
of devices.
When debugging this, I was looking at the XML of Gajim and PSI and first
was somehow confused why Profanity printed "OMEMO: received device
without ID" while the XML looked identical (minus the actual IDs and the
JIDs of course).
However, Gajim was sending the XML without whitespace nodes in between
and PSI did not, so for example the following (with the relevant
whitespace nodes marked with X):
<message type="headline" to="..." from="...">
<event xmlns="http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#event">
<items type="headline" node="eu.siacs.conversations.axolotl.devicelist">
<item id="...">
<list xmlns="eu.siacs.conversations.axolotl">
X <device id="..."/>
X <device id="..."/> X
</list>
</item>
</items>
</event>
<delay xmlns="urn:xmpp:delay" stamp="..." from="..."/>
</message>
... would result in three times the "OMEMO: received device without ID"
error, because we actually have three XML text nodes here that obviously
don't have an "id" attribute.
Now since the <list/> children above aren't really a problem and only
annoying, text nodes in the <prekeys/> stanza actually cause
omemo_start_device_session_handle_bundle to return failure.
I've fixed this by explicitly matching the stanza names we are
interested in, skipping everything else.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
Reported-by: @devhell
For now we initialize gtk in tray_init().
Should maybe use a general function and check in tray_init and
clipboard_init whether gtk was already initialized.
Also we initialize mucuser properly.
Now in case of a carbon of a MUC PM we sv_ev_incoming_carbon() which
calls _sv_ev_incoming_plain() and then we log it via chat_log_msg_in()
in there.
But we also get the sv_ev_incoming_private_message() and call
chat_log_msg_in() in there too. So the incoming message get's logged
twice.
If I'm not mistaken MUC PMs have not been logged at all if there was no
other client sending carbons.
This should add MUC PM logging functionality.
We still need to make sure carbons log to the same file.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1214
Change default themes text color
Using "default" instead of white makes the default better readable
when using a black/dark font on white/light background.
May fix#535
So far if one had enabled `/history` and did `/msg somenick` the history
was loaded from file and displayed like this:
```
04-04-17 15:23 - 3/4/2017:
01-01-00 10:30 - me: ....
01-01-00 10:31 - somebody: ....
01-01-00 10:32 - somebody: ....
```
So the first line contained the actual date. But the date used in each
line was always 01-01-2000. This date was for some reason hardcoded.
This commit now actually uses that date to build the proper GDateTime
instead of just printing it.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/922
This caused the bug mentioned in the PR comment:
```
It seems with the changes done here we get a crash in: src/xmpp/message.c message_handlers_init() when looking up handlers: ProfMessageHandler *handler = g_hash_table_lookup(pubsub_event_handlers, curr->data);.
Steps to reproduce:
open Profanity and connect
/autoping set 10
/autoping timeout 10
stop WiFi/connection
wait for Lost connection
restart wifi
/connect
```
So far only with dummy value.
We will need an identifier that we can hash together with a message ID
and put in as the origin-id.
So when we receive message we can unsplit it and see if it was sent from
this client.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1207
ncursesw defines _XOPEN_SOURCE macro via command-line. In particular, it
is defined in ncursesw.pc and extracted via pkg-config. From other side,
Python defines the same macro unconditionally in pyconfig.h. Python-3.x
defines the macro with value different than ncursesw does. In turn, this
causes a warning that the macro is redefined. And warnings are treated
as errors.
Since both entities define the mecro unconditionally, we can't simply
reorder headers as Python developers suggest. So, undefine the macro
just before the <Python.h> to fix this silly issue.
room is either argv[0] or allocated by GString. We have to free memory
in the 2nd case. Replace argv[0] with g_strdup(argv[0]) in order to
make unconditional g_free().
If we get a private message from a user in a MUC profanity shows this
like:
`profanity@roomsASDF.dismail.de/Martin: Hi`
This was so far logged at:
`~/.local/share/profanity/chatlogs/my-account-at-server/profanity_at_rooms.dismail.de/2019_09_04.log` as:
```
10:48:13 - profanity@rooms.dismail.de: Hi
```
So the nickname was not saved anywhere. This is due to us not knowing
whether we got a regular message from user@server.org/resource or a MUC
PM from room@server.org/user.
We now check for `<x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user' />` and
add the resourcepart to the logging if we get it.
The file will be created at
`~/.local/share/profanity/chatlogs/my-account-at-server/profanity_at_rooms.dismail.de_nick` and look like:
```
23:59:43 - nick: Hi
```
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1184
`sv_ev_room_message()` called `groupchat_log_msg_in()` to log all
incoming MUC messages.
`cl_ev_send_muc_msg()` calls `groupchat_log_msg_out()`.
So messages sent by the user himself was logged two times.
Filter the incoming messages and only log the ones not from our occupant
jid/nick.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1201
We didn't set the variables to NULL, but the rest of the code depends on
this check.
```
==22201== Invalid read of size 8
==22201== at 0x44E560: autocomplete_clear (autocomplete.c:69)
==22201== by 0x427B2C: muc_invites_clear (muc.c:190)
==22201== by 0x461328: ev_disconnect_cleanup (common.c:59)
==22201== by 0x463FB5: cl_ev_disconnect (client_events.c:91)
==22201== by 0x431252: cmd_disconnect (cmd_funcs.c:1234)
==22201== by 0x47E883: clears_chat_sessions
(test_cmd_disconnect.c:28)
==22201== by 0x487E9E1: _run_test (in /usr/lib64/libcmocka.so.0.7.0)
==22201== by 0x487ECCC: _run_tests (in /usr/lib64/libcmocka.so.0.7.0)
==22201== by 0x47F1BE: main (unittests.c:629)
==22201== Address 0x814b690 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd
==22201== at 0x48379AB: free (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==22201== by 0x44E5F7: autocomplete_free (autocomplete.c:90)
==22201== by 0x4278A0: muc_close (muc.c:97)
==22201== by 0x47DBAA: cmd_join_uses_password_when_supplied
(test_cmd_join.c:169)
==22201== by 0x487E9E1: _run_test (in /usr/lib64/libcmocka.so.0.7.0)
==22201== by 0x487ECCC: _run_tests (in /usr/lib64/libcmocka.so.0.7.0)
==22201== by 0x47F1BE: main (unittests.c:629)
==22201== Block was alloc'd at
==22201== at 0x483677F: malloc (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==22201== by 0x44E51B: autocomplete_new (autocomplete.c:57)
==22201== by 0x427837: muc_init (muc.c:88)
==22201== by 0x47DA77: cmd_join_uses_password_when_supplied
(test_cmd_join.c:154)
==22201== by 0x487E9E1: _run_test (in /usr/lib64/libcmocka.so.0.7.0)
==22201== by 0x487ECCC: _run_tests (in /usr/lib64/libcmocka.so.0.7.0)
==22201== by 0x47F1BE: main (unittests.c:629)
```
Incoming carbons are logged as normal message already.
So we had this logged twice but didn't log outgoing carbons,
send from our account but by another client, at all.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1181
