mirror of
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea.git
synced 2024-08-27 22:04:28 -04:00
Fix #27313 (see the comment) And some UI improvements: ### Before ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/420a314d-8f34-4e30-a557-f41cf4f0d2f2) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/60ca0be4-b55e-4e65-be73-fd53e0d4fc36) ### After ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/d354f815-5a0c-4e63-8d59-d03ed344dbea) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/6ef437a4-aa6f-4917-a260-00625ee71e79) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/9d88a36c-616b-4dc9-8c6b-76adaad8acf6)
87 lines
2.3 KiB
CSS
87 lines
2.3 KiB
CSS
.ui.modal.g-modal-confirm {
|
|
max-width: min(800px, 90vw);
|
|
width: fit-content;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.ui.modal.g-modal-confirm > .inside.close.icon {
|
|
padding: 0;
|
|
width: 1em;
|
|
height: 1em;
|
|
top: 1.2em;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.ui.modal > .close.icon[height="16"] {
|
|
top: 0.7em; /* fomantic uses absolute layout, so if we have special icon size, it needs this trick to align vertically */
|
|
color: var(--color-text-dark);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.ui.modal > .header {
|
|
/* can't use display:flex, because some headers have space-separated elements, eg: delete branch modal */
|
|
color: var(--color-text-dark);
|
|
background: var(--color-body);
|
|
border-color: var(--color-secondary);
|
|
border-top-left-radius: var(--border-radius);
|
|
border-top-right-radius: var(--border-radius);
|
|
vertical-align: middle;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.ui.modal > .header .svg {
|
|
vertical-align: middle;
|
|
display: inline-block;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.ui.modal {
|
|
background: var(--color-body);
|
|
box-shadow: 1px 3px 3px 0 var(--color-shadow), 1px 3px 15px 2px var(--color-shadow);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Gitea sometimes use a form in a modal dialog, then the "positive" button could submit the form directly
|
|
Fomantic UI only supports the layout: <div .modal><div .content/><div .actions/></div>
|
|
However, Gitea uses the following layouts:
|
|
* <div .modal><div .content><div .actions/></div></div>
|
|
* <div .modal><form><div .content/><div .actions/></form></div>
|
|
* <div .modal><div .content><form><div .actions/></form></div></div>
|
|
* <div .modal><div .content></div><form><div .actions/></form></div>
|
|
* ...
|
|
These inconsistent layouts should be refactored to simple ones.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
.ui.modal > .content,
|
|
.ui.modal form > .content {
|
|
padding: 1.5em;
|
|
background: var(--color-body);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.ui.modal > .actions,
|
|
.ui.modal .content + .actions,
|
|
.ui.modal .content + form > .actions {
|
|
background: var(--color-secondary-bg);
|
|
border-color: var(--color-secondary);
|
|
padding: 1rem;
|
|
text-align: right;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.ui.modal .content > .actions {
|
|
padding-top: 1em; /* if the "actions" is in the "content", some paddings are already added by the "content" */
|
|
text-align: right;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* positive/negative action buttons */
|
|
.ui.modal .actions > .ui.button {
|
|
display: inline-flex;
|
|
align-items: center;
|
|
padding: 10px 12px 10px 10px;
|
|
margin-right: 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.ui.modal .actions > .ui.button.danger {
|
|
display: block;
|
|
width: 100%;
|
|
margin: 0 auto;
|
|
text-align: center;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.ui.modal .actions > .ui.button .svg {
|
|
margin-right: 5px;
|
|
}
|