ELinks attempted to display a message box on file_download.term, but
it had already closed that terminal and freed the struct terminal. To
fix this, reset file_download.term pointers to NULL when the terminal
is about to be destroyed. Also, assert in download_data_store() that
file_download.term is either NULL or in the global "terminals" list.
Reported by أحمد المحمودي.
ELinks used to call the MD5 code in libgnutls-openssl, part of
GNUTLS-EXTRA, which was licensed under GNU GPL version 2 or later.
In GnuTLS 2.2.0 however, the license of GNUTLS-EXTRA has been changed
to GNU GPL version 3 or later. This is no longer compatible with
GNU GPL version 2 as used in the current ELinks, because GPLv2 clause
2. b) requires the whole work to be licensed under GPLv2, and GPLv3
does not allow that.
If anyone is still using a pre-2.2 GnuTLS, he or she can tweak
configure.in to check the version or just assume it's old enough.
There is not much reason to do so though, as including the MD5 code
in ELinks seems to cost only about 4 kilobytes on i686.
In document.forms, each struct form has form_num and form_end members
that reserve a subrange of [0, INT_MAX] to that form. Previously,
multiple forms in the list could have form_end == INT_MAX and thus
overlap each other. Prevent that by adjusting form_end of each form
newly added to the list.
Revert 438f039bda,
"check_html_form_hierarchy: Old code was buggy.", which made
check_html_form_hierarchy attach controls to the wrong forms.
Instead, construct the dummy form ("for those Flying Dutchmans") at
form_num == 0 always before adding any real forms to the list.
This prevents the assertion failure by ensuring that every possible
form_control.position is covered by some form, if there are any forms.
Add a function assert_forms_list_ok, which checks that the set of
forms actually covers the [0, INT_MAX] range without overlapping,
as intended. Call that from check_html_form_hierarchy to detect
any corruption.
I have tested this code (before any cherry-picking) with:
- bug 613 attachment 210: didn't crash
- bug 714 attachment 471: didn't crash
- bug 961 attachment 382: didn't crash
- bug 698 attachment 239: all the submit buttons showed the right URLs
- bug 698 attachment 470: the submit button showed the right URL
(cherry picked from commit 386a5d517b,
with conflicts)
elinks.keymaps.main["/"] = null;
used to crash ELinks with a segfault in JS_ObjectIsFunction.
Fix that by recognizing JSVAL_NULL explicitly and treating it as "none".
Likewise, if keymap_get_property would return "none" to ECMAScript,
return JSVAL_NULL instead.
When fixing bug 1014, I had added the wrong bug number 451 to NEWS.
Later, I had noticed bug 1014 was missing from NEWS, and added that too.
Don't mention bug 451, which was tagged INVALID already in 2004
and has no real connection to the ELinks 0.11.4 release.
The second argument of PERL_SYS_INIT3 should be a char ***
but ELinks was giving it a char *(*)[1].
Also, enlarge the array to 2 elements, so that my_argv[my_argc] == NULL
like in main(). PERL_SYS_INIT3 seems hardly documented at all so I'm
not sure this is necessary, but it shouldn't hurt.
This patch prevents handle_itrm_stdin() and clear_handlers(itrm->in.std) to be
called when -remote is set and in.std < 0.
It adds two assertions for in.std >= 0 in handle_itrm_stdin() and
unhandle_itrm_stdin().
May be a bad fix, please test and review.
[Added a NEWS entry. --KON]
Do not clear the IXON flag in termios.c_iflag.
Bug 54 did not actually ask for this flag to be kept,
but the cable I am using doesn't seem to have the handshake
lines connected right, so XON/XOFF is a must at 38400 bps,
at least until ELinks learns to send padding based on terminfo.
Any user who has bound actions to Ctrl+S or Ctrl+Q and finds that
they no longer work should just "stty -ixon" before running ELinks.
We don't have any default bindings for those keys, fortunately.
(cherry picked from commit a3d093bd25
but moved the NEWS entry into the 0.11.4rc0 section)
Actually, don't use the cfmakeraw function at all,
and don't look for it during configure either.
(cherry picked from commit 87f1661314
but moved the NEWS entry into the 0.11.4rc0 section)
It is unlikely because the standard members of struct sockaddr_in
(sin_family, sin_port, sin_addr) already require at least 8 bytes
and I don't know of any system that has size_t larger than that.
Besides, at least glibc pads the structure to 16 bytes.
When get_pasv6_socket was merged into get_pasv_socket on 2005-04-15,
the AF_INET6 of get_pasv6_socket was lost and the merged function
always returned AF_INET sockets. This then made getsockname fill
only part of the struct sockaddr_in6, and ELinks sent to the server
an EPRT command that had half the bits missing from the IPv6 address.
At least ftp.funet.fi then rejected the command, helpfully saying
what the address should have been.
This commit fixes active FTP over IPv6. Passive FTP was already fixed
in 0.11.3.GIT (887d650efe), on 2007-05-01.
Today on the elinks-dev mailing list, the new maintainer of the Debian
elinks package asked the debian directory to be removed from released
tarballs, because it makes the Debian diff hard to read. Also, the
files there are out of date.
When the debian directory was discussed in April 2007, people didn't
want it to be removed, so I instead moved it to contrib/debian in
ELinks 0.12.GIT (599cf3d91e).
And now I'm doing the same in 0.11.3.GIT.
On machines where sizeof(size_t) > sizeof(int), this could corrupt the stack.
I think -Wno-pointer-sign added by configure hid this bug until now.
STRLEN is correct in Perl 5.6.0 and later, perhaps earlier too.
The history converted from CVS is not in repo.or.cz though, so keep
referring to pasky.or.cz for that. (We don't seem to use
"gitweb.elinks.cz", which is a DNS alias for pasky.or.cz.)
<paakku> Do you think we should maybe point people to gitweb at
repo.or.cz rather than pasky.or.cz?
<pasky> absolutely
<pasky> actually I thought we already are pointing people at
repo.or.cz
<pasky> at least there was some movement to do that already, I believe
:)
[ From commit 9f75e1f094 in ELinks
0.12.GIT. --KON ]
Revert commit 5a49b9f14d of 2007-05-28,
"NEWS: mention bug 951", which was reverted in commit
f553679336 on 2007-05-30.
It is now safe to apply because bug 956 has been fixed.
