29 lines
3.7 KiB
HTML
29 lines
3.7 KiB
HTML
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
|
|||
|
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>RFC</title><link rel="stylesheet" href="../../jargon.css" type="text/css"/><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.61.0"/><link rel="home" href="../index.html" title="The Jargon File"/><link rel="up" href="../R.html" title="R"/><link rel="previous" href="return-from-the-dead.html" title="return from the dead"/><link rel="next" href="RFE.html" title="RFE"/></head><body><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">RFC</th></tr><tr><td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="return-from-the-dead.html">Prev</a><EFBFBD></td><th width="60%" align="center">R</th><td width="20%" align="right"><EFBFBD><a accesskey="n" href="RFE.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr/></div><dt><a id="RFC"/><dt xmlns="" id="RFC"><b>RFC</b>: <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="pronunciation">/R<>F<EFBFBD>C/</span>, <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="grammar">n.</span></dt></dt><dd><p> [Request For Comment] One of a long-es<65>tab<61>lished series of
|
|||
|
numbered Internet informational documents and standards widely followed by
|
|||
|
commercial software and freeware in the Internet and Unix communities.
|
|||
|
Perhaps the single most influential one has been RFC-822 (the Internet
|
|||
|
mail-format standard). The RFCs are unusual in that they are floated by
|
|||
|
technical experts acting on their own initiative and reviewed by the
|
|||
|
Internet at large, rather than formally promulgated through an institution
|
|||
|
such as ANSI. For this reason, they remain known as RFCs even once adopted
|
|||
|
as standards.</p><p>The RFC tradition of pragmatic, experience-driven, after-the-fact
|
|||
|
standard writing done by individuals or small working groups has important
|
|||
|
advantages over the more formal, committee-driven process typical of ANSI
|
|||
|
or ISO. Emblematic of some of these advantages is the existence of a
|
|||
|
flourishing tradition of ‘joke’ RFCs; usually at least one a
|
|||
|
year is published, usually on April 1st. Well-known joke RFCs have
|
|||
|
included 527 (“<span class="quote">ARPAWOCKY</span>”, R. Merryman, UCSD; 22 June 1973),
|
|||
|
748 (“<span class="quote">Telnet Randomly-Lose Option</span>”, Mark R. Crispin; 1 April
|
|||
|
1978), and 1149 (“<span class="quote">A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on
|
|||
|
Avian Carriers</span>”, D. Waitzman, BBN STC; 1 April 1990). The first was
|
|||
|
a Lewis Carroll pastiche; the second a parody of the TCP-IP documentation
|
|||
|
style, and the third a deadpan skewering of standards-document legalese,
|
|||
|
describing protocols for transmitting Internet data packets by carrier
|
|||
|
pigeon (since actually implemented; see Appendix A). See also
|
|||
|
<a href="../I/Infinite-Monkey-Theorem.html"><i class="glossterm">Infinite-Monkey Theorem</i></a>.</p><p>The RFCs are most remarkable for how well they work — they
|
|||
|
frequently manage to have neither the ambiguities that are usually rife in
|
|||
|
informal specifications, nor the committee-perpetrated misfeatures that
|
|||
|
often haunt formal standards, and they define a network that has grown to
|
|||
|
truly worldwide proportions.</p></dd><div class="navfooter"><hr/><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="return-from-the-dead.html">Prev</a><EFBFBD></td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="../R.html">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"><EFBFBD><a accesskey="n" href="RFE.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">return from the dead<61></td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="../index.html">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"><EFBFBD>RFE</td></tr></table></div></body></html>
|