a663085069
I'm on NixOS, so awk isn't in /usr/bin. I can search for it with /usr/bin/env, but then I can't use -f in the shebang line. |
||
---|---|---|
tests | ||
website@21fbc34f35 | ||
.gitmodules | ||
alternatives | ||
cross-shell-tests | ||
HISTORY | ||
LICENCE | ||
package.json | ||
readme.md | ||
urchin |
__ _
__ ____________/ /_ (_)___
/ / / / ___/ ___/ __ \/ / __ \
/ /_/ / / / /__/ / / / / / / /
\__,_/_/ \___/_/ /_/_/_/ /_/
Urchin is a test framework for shell. It is implemented in portable /bin/sh and should work on GNU/Linux, Mac OS X, and other Unix platforms.
Try it out
Urchin's tests are written in Urchin, so you can run them to see what Urchin is like. Clone the repository
git clone git://github.com/tlevine/urchin.git
Run the tests
cd urchin
./urchin tests
The above command will run the tests in your system's default shell, /bin/sh (on recent Ubuntu this is dash, but it could be ksh or bash on other systems); to test urchin's cross-shell compatibility, run this:
cd urchin
./cross-shell-tests
Globally
Download Urchin like so (as root) (or use npm, below):
cd /usr/local/bin
wget https://raw.github.com/tlevine/urchin/master/urchin
chmod +x urchin
Can be installed with npm too:
npm install -g urchin
Now you can run it.
urchin <test directory>
Run urchin -h
to get command-line help.
Writing tests
Make a root directory for your tests. Inside it, put executable files that
exit 0
on success and something else on fail. Non-executable files and hidden
files (dotfiles) are ignored, so you can store fixtures right next to your
tests. Run urchin from inside the tests directory.
Urchin only cares about the exit status, so you can actually write your tests in any language, not just shell.
More about writing tests
Tests are organized recursively in directories, where the names of the files and directories have special meanings.
tests/
setup
setup_dir
bar/
setup
test_that_something_works
teardown
baz/
jack-in-the-box/
setup
test_that_something_works
teardown
cat-in-the-box/
fixtures/
thingy.pdf
test_thingy
teardown
Directories are processed in a depth-first order. When a particular directory
is processed, setup_dir
is run before everything else in the directory, including
subdirectories. teardown_dir
is run after everything else in the directory.
A directory's setup
file, if it exists, is run right before each test file
within the particular directory, and the teardown
file is run right after.
Files are only run if they are executable, and files beginning with .
are
ignored. Thus, fixtures and libraries can be included sloppily within the test
directory tree. The test passes if the file exits 0; otherwise, it fails.
In case you care about the order in which your tests execute, consider that urchin looks for files within a directory in the following manner.
for file in *; do
do_something_with_test_file $file
done
Tests within a directory are executed in whatever order *
returns.
Writing cross-shell compatibility tests for testing shell code
While you could write your test scripts to explicitly invoke the functionality to test with various shells, Urchin facilitates a more flexible approach.
The specific approach depends on your test scenario:
- (a) Your test scripts invoke scripts containing portable shell code.
- (b) Your scripts source scripts containing portable shell code.
(a) Cross-shell tests with test scripts that invoke shell scripts
First, consider using shall.
#!/usr/bin/env shall
echo This is a test file.
Alternatively, you can use urchin's built-in recognition of the
TEST_SHELL
environment variable.
In your test scripts, invoke the shell scripts to test via the shell
specified in environment variable TEST_SHELL
rather than directly;
e.g.: $TEST_SHELL ../foo bar
(rather than just ../foo bar
).
Note that if you alsow want your test scripts to work when run directly,
outside of Urchin, be sure to target scripts that happen to be in the
current directory with prefix ./
; e.g., $TEST_SHELL ./baz
(rather than $TEST_SHELL baz
).
Then, on invocation of Urchin, prepend a definition of environment variable
TEST_SHELL
specifying the shell to test with, e.g.: TEST_SHELL=zsh urchin ./tests
.
To test with multiple shells in sequence, use something like:
for shell in sh bash ksh zsh; do
TEST_SHELL=$shell urchin ./tests
done
If TEST_SHELL
has no value, Urchin defines it as /bin/sh
, so the test
scripts can rely on $TEST_SHELL
always containing a value.
(b) Cross-shell tests with test scripts that source shell scripts
If you source shell code in your test scripts, it is the test scripts themselves that must be run with the shell specified.
To that end, Urchin supports the -s <shell>
option, which instructs
Urchin to invoke the test scripts with the specified shell; e.g., -s bash
.
(In addition, Urchin sets environment variable TEST_SHELL
to the specified
shell.)
Note that only test scripts that either have no shebang line at all or
have shebang line #!/bin/sh
are invoked with the specified shell.
This allows non-shell test scripts or test scripts for specific
shells to coexist with those whose invocation should be controlled by -s
.
To test with multiple shells in sequence, use something like:
for shell in sh bash ksh zsh; do
urchin -s $shell ./tests
done
Alternatives to Urchin
Alternatives to Urchin are discussed in this blog post.
Ideas for new features
- Support Nagios plugins
- Stop running if a test fails so one can use Urchin as a setup framework.