debian and freedesktop forges impose CAPTCHA
This commit is contained in:
@@ -73,12 +73,16 @@ These are the ethical problems with that specific instance:
|
||||
|
||||
consequently [FSF criteria C3][fsfCriteria] is unmet.
|
||||
|
||||
8. Gitlab.com treats Tor users trying to register with hostility.
|
||||
Access is inconvenient in some cases (e.g. GUI users), while access
|
||||
is outright denied to other Tor users (e.g. terminal users with
|
||||
non-GUI browsers, browsers without javascript capability, and users
|
||||
who happen to use a high traffic exit node).
|
||||
[FSF criteria C3][fsfCriteria] is therefore unmet.
|
||||
8. Gitlab.com treats people trying to register with hostility if their
|
||||
ISP uses CGNAT or if they use Tor. Access is inconvenient in some
|
||||
cases (e.g. GUI users), while access is outright denied to other
|
||||
users (e.g. terminal users with non-GUI browsers, browsers without
|
||||
javascript capability, and users who happen to use a high traffic
|
||||
exit node). ISPs in Serbia and India often use CGNAT for their
|
||||
lowest tiers of service while charging an extra fee for IPv4 or
|
||||
IPv6. This means gitlab.com is effectively discriminating against
|
||||
poor people, Serbians, and Indians.
|
||||
[FSF criteria C2 & C3][fsfCriteria] is therefore unmet.
|
||||
1. Gitlab.com refuses service to users who attempt to register with a
|
||||
`@spamgourmet.com` forwarding email address to track spam and to
|
||||
protect their more sensitive internal email address. This means
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user