From e1a65ae57afb791683fbf70dea094f04bb04a07e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Kost Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 13:00:56 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Fix typos. Fixes a regression introduced in commit f31f1acac2efb4bc6558b604a07b56f826423177. Reported-by roptat on #guix. * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix build): Use "@@" instead of "@". --- doc/guix.texi | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index 719ebd917a..8c4067fbd4 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -4511,7 +4511,7 @@ guix build --quiet --keep-going \ @var{package-or-derivation} may be either the name of a package found in the software distribution such as @code{coreutils} or -@code{coreutils@8.20}, or a derivation such as +@code{coreutils@@8.20}, or a derivation such as @file{/gnu/store/@dots{}-coreutils-8.19.drv}. In the former case, a package with the corresponding name (and optionally version) is searched for among the GNU distribution modules (@pxref{Package Modules}). @@ -5671,7 +5671,7 @@ single output for a package that could easily be split (@pxref{Packages with Multiple Outputs}). Such are the typical issues that @command{guix size} can highlight. -The command can be passed a package specification such as @code{gcc@4.8} +The command can be passed a package specification such as @code{gcc@@4.8} or @code{guile:debug}, or a file name in the store. Consider this example: