mirror of
https://github.com/thangisme/notes.git
synced 2024-11-01 06:27:23 -04:00
260 lines
9.2 KiB
JavaScript
260 lines
9.2 KiB
JavaScript
"use strict"
|
|
|
|
const _ = require("lodash")
|
|
const assignDisabledRanges = require("../assignDisabledRanges")
|
|
const basicChecks = require("./basicChecks")
|
|
const lessSyntax = require("postcss-less")
|
|
const normalizeRuleSettings = require("../normalizeRuleSettings")
|
|
const postcss = require("postcss")
|
|
const scssSyntax = require("postcss-scss")
|
|
const sugarss = require("sugarss")
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Create a stylelint rule testing function.
|
|
*
|
|
* Pass in an `equalityCheck` function. Given some information,
|
|
* this checker should use Whatever Test Runner to perform
|
|
* equality checks.
|
|
*
|
|
* `equalityCheck` should accept two arguments:
|
|
* - `processCss` {Promise}: A Promise that resolves with an array of
|
|
* comparisons that you need to check (documented below).
|
|
* - `context` {object}: An object that contains additional information
|
|
* you may need:
|
|
* - `caseDescription` {string}: A description of the test case as a whole.
|
|
* Will look like this:
|
|
* > rule: value-list-comma-space-before
|
|
* > config: "always-single-line"
|
|
* > code: "a { background-size: 0 ,0;\n}"
|
|
* - `comparisonCount` {number}: The number of comparisons that
|
|
* will need to be performed (e.g. useful for tape).
|
|
* - `completeAssertionDescription` {string}: While each individual
|
|
* comparison may have its own description, this is a description
|
|
* of the whole assertion (e.g. useful for Mocha).
|
|
* - `only` {boolean}: If `true`, the test runner should only run this
|
|
* test case (e.g. `test.only` in tape, `describe.only` in Mocha).
|
|
*
|
|
* `processCss` is a Promsie that resolves with an array of comparisons.
|
|
* Each comparison has the following properties:
|
|
* - `actual` {any}: Some actual value.
|
|
* - `expected` {any}: Some expected value.
|
|
* - `description` {string}: A (possibly empty) description of the comparison.
|
|
*
|
|
* Within `equalityCheck`, you need to ensure that you:
|
|
* - Set up the test case.
|
|
* - When `processCss` resolves, loop through every comparison.
|
|
* - For each comparison, make an assertion checking that `actual === expected`.
|
|
*
|
|
* The `testRule` function that you get has a simple signature:
|
|
* `testRule(rule, testGroupDescription)`.
|
|
*
|
|
* `rule` is just the rule that you are testing (a function).
|
|
*
|
|
* `testGroupDescription` is an object fitting the following schema.
|
|
*
|
|
* Required properties:
|
|
* - `ruleName` {string}: The name of the rule. Used in descriptions.
|
|
* - `config` {any}: The rule's configuration for this test group.
|
|
* Should match the format you'd use in `.stylelintrc`.
|
|
* - `accept` {array}: An array of objects describing test cases that
|
|
* should not violate the rule. Each object has these properties:
|
|
* - `code` {string}: The source CSS to check.
|
|
* - `description` {[string]}: An optional description of the case.
|
|
* - `reject` {array}: An array of objects describing test cases that
|
|
* should violate the rule once. Each object has these properties:
|
|
* - `code` {string}: The source CSS to check.
|
|
* - `message` {string}: The message of the expected violation.
|
|
* - `line` {[number]}: The expected line number of the violation.
|
|
* If this is left out, the line won't be checked.
|
|
* - `column` {[number]}: The expected column number of the violation.
|
|
* If this is left out, the column won't be checked.
|
|
* - `description` {[string]}: An optional description of the case.
|
|
*
|
|
* Optional properties:
|
|
* - `syntax` {"css"|"scss"|"less"|"sugarss"}: Defaults to `"css"`.
|
|
* - `skipBasicChecks` {boolean}: Defaults to `false`. If `true`, a
|
|
* few rudimentary checks (that should almost always be included)
|
|
* will not be performed.
|
|
* - `preceedingPlugins` {array}: An array of PostCSS plugins that
|
|
* should be run before the CSS is tested.
|
|
*
|
|
* @param {function} equalityCheck - Described above
|
|
* @return {function} testRule - Decsribed above
|
|
*/
|
|
let onlyTest
|
|
|
|
function checkCaseForOnly(caseType, testCase) {
|
|
if (!testCase.only) {
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
/* istanbul ignore next */
|
|
if (onlyTest) {
|
|
throw new Error("Cannot use `only` on multiple test cases")
|
|
}
|
|
onlyTest = { case: testCase, type: caseType }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
module.exports = function (equalityCheck) {
|
|
return function (rule, schema) {
|
|
const alreadyHadOnlyTest = !!onlyTest
|
|
if (schema.accept) {
|
|
schema.accept.forEach(_.partial(checkCaseForOnly, "accept"))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (schema.reject) {
|
|
schema.reject.forEach(_.partial(checkCaseForOnly, "reject"))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (onlyTest) {
|
|
schema = _.assign(_.omit(schema, [ "accept", "reject" ]), {
|
|
skipBasicChecks: true,
|
|
[onlyTest.type]: [onlyTest.case],
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!alreadyHadOnlyTest) {
|
|
process.nextTick(() => {
|
|
processGroup(rule, schema, equalityCheck)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function processGroup(rule, schema, equalityCheck) {
|
|
const ruleName = schema.ruleName
|
|
|
|
const ruleOptions = normalizeRuleSettings(schema.config, ruleName)
|
|
const rulePrimaryOptions = ruleOptions[0]
|
|
const ruleSecondaryOptions = ruleOptions[1]
|
|
|
|
let printableConfig = rulePrimaryOptions ? JSON.stringify(rulePrimaryOptions) : ""
|
|
if (printableConfig && ruleSecondaryOptions) {
|
|
printableConfig += ", " + JSON.stringify(ruleSecondaryOptions)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function createCaseDescription(code) {
|
|
let text = `\n> rule: ${ruleName}\n`
|
|
text += `> config: ${printableConfig}\n`
|
|
text += `> code: ${JSON.stringify(code)}\n`
|
|
return text
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Process the code through the rule and return
|
|
// the PostCSS LazyResult promise
|
|
function postcssProcess(code) {
|
|
const postcssProcessOptions = {}
|
|
|
|
switch (schema.syntax) {
|
|
case "scss":
|
|
postcssProcessOptions.syntax = scssSyntax
|
|
break
|
|
case "less":
|
|
postcssProcessOptions.syntax = lessSyntax
|
|
break
|
|
case "sugarss":
|
|
postcssProcessOptions.syntax = sugarss
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const processor = postcss()
|
|
processor.use(assignDisabledRanges)
|
|
|
|
if (schema.preceedingPlugins) {
|
|
schema.preceedingPlugins.forEach(processor.use)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return processor.use(rule(rulePrimaryOptions, ruleSecondaryOptions)).process(code, postcssProcessOptions)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Apply the basic positive checks unless
|
|
// explicitly told not to
|
|
const passingTestCases = schema.skipBasicChecks ? schema.accept : basicChecks.concat(schema.accept)
|
|
|
|
if (passingTestCases && passingTestCases.length) {
|
|
passingTestCases.forEach(acceptedCase => {
|
|
if (!acceptedCase) {
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
const assertionDescription = spaceJoin(acceptedCase.description, "should be accepted")
|
|
const resultPromise = postcssProcess(acceptedCase.code).then(postcssResult => {
|
|
const warnings = postcssResult.warnings()
|
|
return [{
|
|
expected: 0,
|
|
actual: warnings.length,
|
|
description: assertionDescription,
|
|
}]
|
|
}).catch(err => console.log(err.stack)) // eslint-disable-line no-console
|
|
|
|
equalityCheck(resultPromise, {
|
|
comparisonCount: 1,
|
|
caseDescription: createCaseDescription(acceptedCase.code),
|
|
completeAssertionDescription: assertionDescription,
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (schema.reject && schema.reject.length) {
|
|
schema.reject.forEach(rejectedCase => {
|
|
let completeAssertionDescription = "should register one warning"
|
|
let comparisonCount = 1
|
|
if (rejectedCase.line) {
|
|
comparisonCount++
|
|
completeAssertionDescription += ` on line ${rejectedCase.line}`
|
|
}
|
|
if (rejectedCase.column !== undefined) {
|
|
comparisonCount++
|
|
completeAssertionDescription += ` on column ${rejectedCase.column}`
|
|
}
|
|
if (rejectedCase.message) {
|
|
comparisonCount++
|
|
completeAssertionDescription += ` with message "${rejectedCase.message}"`
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const resultPromise = postcssProcess(rejectedCase.code).then(postcssResult => {
|
|
const warnings = postcssResult.warnings()
|
|
const warning = warnings[0]
|
|
|
|
const comparisons = [{
|
|
expected: 1,
|
|
actual: warnings.length,
|
|
description: spaceJoin(rejectedCase.description, "should register one warning"),
|
|
}]
|
|
|
|
if (rejectedCase.line) {
|
|
comparisons.push({
|
|
expected: rejectedCase.line,
|
|
actual: _.get(warning, "line"),
|
|
description: spaceJoin(rejectedCase.description, `should warn on line ${rejectedCase.line}`),
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
if (rejectedCase.column !== undefined) {
|
|
comparisons.push({
|
|
expected: rejectedCase.column,
|
|
actual: _.get(warning, "column"),
|
|
description: spaceJoin(rejectedCase.description, `should warn on column ${rejectedCase.column}`),
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
if (rejectedCase.message) {
|
|
comparisons.push({
|
|
expected: rejectedCase.message,
|
|
actual: _.get(warning, "text"),
|
|
description: spaceJoin(rejectedCase.description, `should warn with message ${rejectedCase.message}`),
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
return comparisons
|
|
}).catch(err => console.log(err.stack)) // eslint-disable-line no-console
|
|
|
|
equalityCheck(resultPromise, {
|
|
comparisonCount,
|
|
completeAssertionDescription,
|
|
caseDescription: createCaseDescription(rejectedCase.code),
|
|
only: rejectedCase.only,
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function spaceJoin() {
|
|
return _.compact(Array.from(arguments)).join(" ")
|
|
}
|