With the arrival of Vim9 classes, the syntax must allow for
_new_ constructors; multiple constructor definitions are
supported for a class, provided distinct suffix-names are
used. Currently, the defined constructors match either
vimCommand or vimFunctionError (for any newBar).
For example:
------------------------------------------------------------
vim9script
class Foo
def new()
enddef
def newBar()
enddef
endclass
------------------------------------------------------------
Since every constructor is required to bear a lower-cased
_new_ prefix name, it should suffice to distinguish them
from functions, and so there are no new highlight or syntax
groups introduced.
Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: h-east <h.east.727@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Kearns <dougkearns@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
These were included with the initial release of the syntax file for Vim
5 and were probably intended to allow for syn-region start/skip/end
patterns with a '!' or '+' delimiter. However, these cases are
currently handled by the vimSynRegPat group.
The removed patterns never match anywhere in the distributed runtime
files and it is believed that this is generally true.
closes: #14035
Signed-off-by: Doug Kearns <dougkearns@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
- Add missing "Last Change:" line.
- The date on this line in vim.vim is updated by update_date.vim at
Make time. (I made a mistake in the file path)
- Remove unnecessary "b:loaded_syntax_vim_ex".
- Remove "Base File Date:" line in vim.vim.base
- Add Doug Kearns as Maintainer
closes: #14031
Signed-off-by: h-east <h.east.727@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
