And do not link either to any group.
Resolveszzzyxwvut/java-vim#2.
Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
The current implementation falls short for syntax test files
on two accounts:
1. With folded lines -- some lines before folded lines are
unnecessarily repeated in generated dump files because
closed folded lines are always treated as opened for the
cursor to move _in_ instead of to move _over_ them.
2. With wrapped lines (longer than 75 columns) -- some lines
are omitted in generated dump files because calculations
for the cursor progress and its movement commands only
refer to file lines and not their layout within a 20x75
buffer (less &cmdheight).
As an alternative, we abandon deterministic (and inaccurate
at times) calculations for the cursor progress and, instead,
advance the cursor by as much as before for a single dump
file, but now rely on marking the last visible line and
additional movement to position lines at desired offsets,
carefully preserving compatibility for the &scrolloff and
&ruler values inherited from defaults.vim. The parent Vim
process will keep track of progress through a syntax test
file made by its child process ("terminal") by reading the
rightmost end of the ruler line from the terminal buffer,
looking for " All " or " Bot " for its cue to finish dump
file generation.
With these changes applied, the lossless line length limit
will be raised from 75 to 1425 (for a 19x75 view) columns.
Also, prefer "lastline" to "truncate" for &display; hiding
the content of any last _long_ line in a view goes against
the purpose of syntax file testing -- all lines should be
recorded.
related: #15150fixes: #14245
Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Instances of anonymous classes can be passed as method
arguments and should be subject to line folding as well.
closes: #15048
Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
Also:
- Restore the capability to mark as an error braces nested
in parens with g:javaInParen.
- Try not to fold top-level-type bodies. (Defining multiple
package-private top level types in a single source file is
not recommended as it can impose order among compilation
units; so it is assumed that only one such top level type
is usually defined.)
- Compose ‘method header’ highlighting and block braces
folding.
- Do not highlight block braces whenever ‘method header’
highlighting is requested.
This bundling of ‘method headers’ and block braces for
highlighting can be traced back to Vim v5.0; however, no
comment or documentation entry conveys any justification.
For example, it is hard to discover the connection between
block braces for "while", "if", etc., statements and method
body block braces. The former behaviour can be attained in,
e.g. ~/.vim/after/syntax/java.vim:
------------------------------------------------------------
if exists("g:java_highlight_functions")
syn clear javaBlock javaInParen
syn match javaBlockOther "[{}]"
syn region javaBlock transparent matchgroup=javaBlockStart
\ start="\%(^\|^\S[^:]\+\)\@120<!{" end="}" fold
hi def link javaBlockStart javaFuncDef
hi def link javaBlockOther javaBlockStart
if exists("g:java_mark_braces_in_parens_as_errors")
syn match javaInParen contained "[{}]"
endif
endif
------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Read ‘a method header omitting a _throws_ clause’ for
every ‘method header’ appellation used above.
Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
