diff --git a/src/testdir/test_vim9_class.vim b/src/testdir/test_vim9_class.vim index fc0edeb5ba..cac8b63c7e 100644 --- a/src/testdir/test_vim9_class.vim +++ b/src/testdir/test_vim9_class.vim @@ -6458,6 +6458,39 @@ def Test_abstract_method() assert_equal('foo', A.Foo()) END v9.CheckSourceSuccess(lines) + + # Invoke method returning a value through the abstract class. See #15432. + lines =<< trim END + vim9script + + abstract class A + abstract def String(): string + endclass + + class B extends A + def String(): string + return 'B' + enddef + endclass + + def F(o: A) + assert_equal('B', o.String()) + enddef + F(B.new()) + END + v9.CheckSourceSuccess(lines) + + # Invoke abstract method returning a value does not compile + lines =<< trim END + vim9script + + abstract class A + abstract def String(): string + return 'X' + enddef + endclass + END + v9.CheckScriptFailure(lines, "E1318: Not a valid command in a class: return 'X'") enddef " Test for calling a class method from a subclass diff --git a/src/version.c b/src/version.c index 6e6b651a1c..ba41159774 100644 --- a/src/version.c +++ b/src/version.c @@ -704,6 +704,8 @@ static char *(features[]) = static int included_patches[] = { /* Add new patch number below this line */ +/**/ + 1034, /**/ 1033, /**/ diff --git a/src/vim9compile.c b/src/vim9compile.c index fa02871e8b..338415e85f 100644 --- a/src/vim9compile.c +++ b/src/vim9compile.c @@ -4917,9 +4917,10 @@ compile_def_function( goto erret; ufunc->uf_args_visible = ufunc->uf_args.ga_len; - // Compiling a function in an interface is done to get the function type. - // No code is actually compiled. - if (ufunc->uf_class != NULL && IS_INTERFACE(ufunc->uf_class)) + // Compiling an abstract method or a function in an interface is done to + // get the function type. No code is actually compiled. + if (ufunc->uf_class != NULL && (IS_INTERFACE(ufunc->uf_class) + || IS_ABSTRACT_METHOD(ufunc))) { ufunc->uf_def_status = UF_NOT_COMPILED; ret = OK;