thac0/vim
1
0
Fork 0
forked from aniani/vim
Code Activity

patch 8.2.0251: a couple of function return types can be more specific

Browse Source 
Problem:    A couple of function return types can be more specific.
Solution:   Use a better return type. (Ken Takata, closes #5629)
This commit is contained in:
Bram Moolenaar
2020-02-12 22:25:56 +01:00
parent 4f5776c17c
commit 7306d6b1c9
3 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/evalfunc.c
View File

@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static funcentry_T global_functions[] =
{"matcharg", 1, 1, FEARG_1, &t_list_string, f_matcharg},
{"matchdelete", 1, 2, FEARG_1, &t_number, f_matchdelete},
{"matchend", 2, 4, FEARG_1, &t_number, f_matchend},
{"matchlist", 2, 4, FEARG_1, &t_list_any, f_matchlist},
{"matchlist", 2, 4, FEARG_1, &t_list_string, f_matchlist},
{"matchstr", 2, 4, FEARG_1, &t_string, f_matchstr},
{"matchstrpos", 2, 4, FEARG_1, &t_list_any, f_matchstrpos},
{"max", 1, 1, FEARG_1, &t_any, f_max},
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ static funcentry_T global_functions[] =
{"prop_add", 3, 3, FEARG_1, &t_void, f_prop_add},
{"prop_clear", 1, 3, FEARG_1, &t_void, f_prop_clear},
{"prop_find", 1, 2, FEARG_1, &t_dict_any, f_prop_find},
{"prop_list", 1, 2, FEARG_1, &t_list_any, f_prop_list},
{"prop_list", 1, 2, FEARG_1, &t_list_dict_any, f_prop_list},
{"prop_remove", 1, 3, FEARG_1, &t_number, f_prop_remove},
{"prop_type_add", 2, 2, FEARG_1, &t_void, f_prop_type_add},
{"prop_type_change", 2, 2, FEARG_1, &t_void, f_prop_type_change},

2
src/version.c
View File

@@ -742,6 +742,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
/**/
251,
/**/
250,
/**/