diff --git a/codeberg.md b/codeberg.md
index 946bb4c..35f9830 100644
--- a/codeberg.md
+++ b/codeberg.md
@@ -186,9 +186,30 @@ project.
 > According to GDPR, we are obligued to remove sensitive user
 > information as soon as a concerned person demands us to do so.
 
-CFT complied.  Even though the sole complaint lead to an investigation
-that found the data accurate, it was removed anyway and therefore CFT
+The GDPR does not protect legal persons (i.e. organizations) and it
+does not protect anonymous information.  Specifically:
+
+```
+"The principles of data protection should therefore not apply to
+anonymous information, namely information which does not relate to an
+identified or identifiable natural person or to personal data rendered
+anonymous in such a manner that the data subject is not or no longer
+identifiable. This Regulation does not therefore concern the
+processing of such anonymous information, including for statistical or
+research purposes."
+```
+CFT's Cloudflare supporter list did not contain real names; only
+pseudoanonymous aliases.
+
+The listed alias of the subject who complained did not use an alias
+formed like "firstname_lastname", or any form that could reasonably
+identify a natural individual person.
+
+The sole complaint CFT received lead to an investigation that found
+the data accurate.  Even though the GDPR right to be forgotten does
+not have force in that case, it was removed anyway and therefore CFT
 was (and remains) in compliance with the GDPR right to be forgotten.
+
 Yet Codeberg still removed the project despite immediate compliance.
 
 > as well as Cloudflare employee data, that are considered as private
@@ -204,7 +225,13 @@ their employees, so it's already public information.
 > thus could not even imagine a reason for being listed there.
 
 CFT only received one complaint regarding one individual.  CFT
-complied with the GDPR.
+complied with the GDPR.  Codeberg destroyed the repository anyway.
+
+"*Support*" comes in many forms.  You can support Cloudflare by
+praising it, or you can support Cloudflare through actions (which may
+even be unwitting to the supporter).  In the one case that CFT
+investigated, the subject's understanding narrowly assumed "support"
+was limited to philosophical praise.
 
 > We can not accept anyone attacking and threatening us and our users
 > (or anyone for that matter), or inciting others to do so.