mirror of
https://github.com/vim/vim.git
synced 2025-07-26 11:04:33 -04:00
patch 9.1.0082: Redrawing can be improved when deleting lines with 'cursorline'
Problem: Redrawing can be improved when deleting lines with 'cursorline'. Solution: Use smarter invalidation and adjustment. Remove unnecessary UPD_VALID as it is already set at the top of the loop. Make the test for #4862 fail without the fix. (zeertzjq) closes: #13986 Signed-off-by: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b8170143c8
commit
7ce34c9a94
22
src/change.c
22
src/change.c
@ -656,22 +656,20 @@ changed_common(
|
||||
set_topline(wp, wp->w_topline);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
// If lines have been added or removed, relative numbering always
|
||||
// requires a redraw.
|
||||
// requires an update even if cursor didn't move.
|
||||
if (wp->w_p_rnu && xtra != 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
wp->w_last_cursor_lnum_rnu = 0;
|
||||
redraw_win_later(wp, UPD_VALID);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef FEAT_SYN_HL
|
||||
// Cursor line highlighting probably need to be updated with
|
||||
// "UPD_VALID" if it's below the change.
|
||||
// If the cursor line is inside the change we need to redraw more.
|
||||
if (wp->w_p_cul)
|
||||
if (wp->w_p_cul && wp->w_last_cursorline >= lnum)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (xtra == 0)
|
||||
redraw_win_later(wp, UPD_VALID);
|
||||
else if (lnum <= wp->w_last_cursorline)
|
||||
redraw_win_later(wp, UPD_SOME_VALID);
|
||||
if (wp->w_last_cursorline < lnume)
|
||||
// If 'cursorline' was inside the change, it has already
|
||||
// been invalidated in w_lines[] by the loop above.
|
||||
wp->w_last_cursorline = 0;
|
||||
else
|
||||
// If 'cursorline' was below the change, adjust its lnum.
|
||||
wp->w_last_cursorline += xtra;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -557,22 +557,23 @@ func Test_cursorline_after_yank()
|
||||
call StopVimInTerminal(buf)
|
||||
endfunc
|
||||
|
||||
" test for issue #4862
|
||||
" Test for issue #4862: pasting above 'cursorline' redraws properly.
|
||||
func Test_put_before_cursorline()
|
||||
new
|
||||
only!
|
||||
call setline(1, 'A')
|
||||
call setline(1, ['A', 'B', 'C'])
|
||||
call cursor(2, 1)
|
||||
redraw
|
||||
let std_attr = screenattr(1, 1)
|
||||
let std_attr = screenattr(2, 1)
|
||||
set cursorline
|
||||
redraw
|
||||
let cul_attr = screenattr(1, 1)
|
||||
let cul_attr = screenattr(2, 1)
|
||||
normal yyP
|
||||
redraw
|
||||
" Line 1 has cursor so it should be highlighted with CursorLine.
|
||||
call assert_equal(cul_attr, screenattr(1, 1))
|
||||
" And CursorLine highlighting from the second line should be gone.
|
||||
call assert_equal(std_attr, screenattr(2, 1))
|
||||
" Line 2 has cursor so it should be highlighted with CursorLine.
|
||||
call assert_equal(cul_attr, screenattr(2, 1))
|
||||
" And CursorLine highlighting from line 3 should be gone.
|
||||
call assert_equal(std_attr, screenattr(3, 1))
|
||||
set nocursorline
|
||||
bwipe!
|
||||
endfunc
|
||||
|
@ -704,6 +704,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
|
||||
|
||||
static int included_patches[] =
|
||||
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
|
||||
/**/
|
||||
82,
|
||||
/**/
|
||||
81,
|
||||
/**/
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user