patch 9.1.1393: missing test for switching buffers and reusing curbuf

Problem:  The check in buf_freeall that restores curwin subtly prevents
          leaving an unloaded buffer in a window when reusing curbuf, if
          autocommands switch to a different buffer.
Solution: Add a test case that covers this. Also ensure splitting isn't
          possible, as that could do the same (Sean Dewar)

closes: #17325

Signed-off-by: Sean Dewar <6256228+seandewar@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>

src/testdir/test_autocmd.vim

@@ -5415,4 +5415,31 @@ func Test_reuse_curbuf_leak()
   %bw!
 endfunc
 
+func Test_reuse_curbuf_switch()
+  edit asdf
+  let s:asdf_win = win_getid()
+  new
+  let other_buf = bufnr()
+  let other_win = win_getid()
+  augroup testing
+    autocmd!
+    autocmd BufUnload * ++once let s:triggered = 1
+          \| call assert_fails('split', 'E1159:')
+          \| call win_gotoid(s:asdf_win)
+  augroup END
+
+  " Check BufUnload changing curbuf does not cause buflist_new to create a new
+  " buffer while leaving "other_buf" unloaded in a window.
+  enew
+  call assert_equal(1, s:triggered)
+  call assert_equal(other_buf, bufnr())
+  call assert_equal(other_win, win_getid())
+  call assert_equal(1, win_findbuf(other_buf)->len())
+  call assert_equal(1, bufloaded(other_buf))
+
+  unlet! s:asdf_win s:triggered
+  call CleanUpTestAuGroup()
+  %bw!
+endfunc
+
 " vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab

src/version.c

@@ -709,6 +709,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
 
 static int included_patches[] =
 {   /* Add new patch number below this line */
+/**/
+    1393,
 /**/
     1392,
 /**/