`/logging group color` has:
* `unanimous` which will color it with one unanimous color. Like it was
done always.
* `regular` which colors it like regular incoming messages.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1261
* Add .builds/openbsd.yml for builds.sr.ht
* Update travis-build.sh -> ci-build.sh with OpenBSD case
* Fix libdl check in configure.ac (OpenBSD has libdl built-in)
* Fix some minor issues found when compiling on OpenBSD with GCC (e.g.
uninitialized variables)
If we are connected with another client and send a message, then correct
it. We now display it correctly in Profanity.
Id wasn't saved for carbon copied messages too so far.
So far receipts are only send if we have enabled it and the other client
supports it.
But it could be that the other person is connected with several clients.
One supporting it and the other which doesn't. If the not supporting one
is active and we send to a fulljid, then we won't get receipts.
Probably it's best to just always send them if they are enabled in
Profanity. And not try to find out the capabilities of the other client.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1268
In aa3693daa211b36c78d136d5a1ee9f3258e21352 I renamed
`win_println_me_message()` -> `win_print_outgoing_muc_msg()`.
Now: `win_println_them_message()` -> `win_println_incoming_muc_msg()`
to be more consistent and descriptive.
XEP-0308 Version 1.1.0 (2019-05-15) states "It is expected that clients will not send message corrections to clients that do not support them, as non-supporting clients will render these as duplicate (corrected) messages"
```
10:12:47 - jubalh: Do clients actually check whether other clients support xep0308 (LMC) before sending?
10:13:13 - pep.: not poezio, and I doubt anybody does. it's the "but carbons/MAM" argument
10:13:49 - jubalh: Profanity doesnt support this yet. So I always get the message twice. One time the message, and then the corrected ones. And I think that's right. But I understood xep0308 correctly it sais a
client shouldnt sent a message with 'replace' if the client doesnt support it? I don't see why
10:14:50 - Ge0rG: jubalh: because you might also use Conversations and read the backlog from MAM on conversations
10:15:51 - jubalh: Ge0rG: sorry?
10:16:36 - Ge0rG: jubalh: when I'm sending you a message, I don't know which client you'll use to read it. So it doesn't make sense to limit the features I use
10:27:57 - jubalh: Yes. That's why I'm confused by thestatement in the XEP
10:28:13 - jubalh: "It is expected that clients will not send message corrections to clients that do not support them, as non-supporting clients will render these as duplicate (corrected) messages. "
10:28:37 - Holger: Yes, you're both saying the same thing. And yes I agree, that part of the XEP is nonsense. We have that "check whether the peer's client supports it" stuff in various XEPs that depend on
recipient's features and it never makes sense as it doesn't cope with multi-device, MAM, groupchat.
10:28:53 - jubalh: First: You don't know if he is connected with several clients. Some supporting it and some not. Second: Why not just resend the new corrected message? Then he has both messages and no
information is lost. If he only gets the first one information is lost
10:29:20 - jubalh: Okay
10:29:30 - jubalh: Then I won't implement it this way. Thanks guys!
10:29:34 - Holger: Well UX is a bit meh if the recipient doesn't support it (I'm an MCabber user and know what I'm talking about) but I see no better solution, yes.
```
So it makes more sense to just always send it. Non supporting clients will then get the message and the corrected message. So they get it "twice". Which is the right thing to do in my opinion.
_win_print() and _win_printf() sound like they are the same. But
actually they are something totally different.
I renamed _win_print() to _win_print_internal() for that reason. It's
more about actually drawing to the ncurses window.
_win_printf() calls _win_print() and also writes the text to the window
buffer. Which _win_print() didn't, it was really just the ncurses
specific things.
In some cases there is _win_print_internal() called after a
buffer_append() in those cases it might be more correct to actually call
_win_printf().
It was not done so far. But probably is better. But will mean a bit more
operations.
I'll have to check this later.
So far the correction is sent. But the UI in Profanity itself is not
updated.
Also autocompletion for `/correct` with the last sent message is
missing.
I think both the window and the buffer should also be cleared in case
`/clear` is issue and persist_history is off.
Otherwise it could happen that win_redraw() redraws the whole content of
the buffer again.
So far we saved the timestamp which also had the `from`.
But we need this only to find out whether it's MUC history.
For displaying we should use the oldest delay timestamp.
Also in
61f66966dd (diff-4926fd4577a336bd3eb240f8104a5c5bL837)
a error was introduced.
Before we saved the timestamp in all cases. And only if timestamp AND
from was given we went into MUC history case.
Normal timestamp saving was not done anymore only if it also had a from
attribute.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1254
So far we got the first delay with a from that comes from the server.
This way we know it's MUC history.
Now we take the first time stamp we actually find. Which is likely the
one being added first. And should contain the correct time to display.
It would be nicer to actually compare the dates though.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1254
Cannot be configured for now.
Can be set via `adv.notify.discoversion` in the `notification` section.
Will notify about version requests via XEP-0092 and XEP-0232.
Client version can still be seen via caps (capabilities).
See `stanza_attach_caps()`.
`/roster room use name` to use the name of the MUC in the roster list.
`/roster room use jid` to use the jid of the MUC in the roster list.
Display it only in case `/roster room by none` is set so far.
prekey is defined as `<xs:attribute name="prekey" type="xs:boolean"/>`
which allows both `true` and `1` as truthy values.
Not checking for `1` breaks omemo encryption when interacting with
clients which set prekey="1", example: psi+ 1.4.983
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1247
So far `/occupants char *`, `/roster contact char *`, `/roster room char #`,
`/roster header char -`, `/occupants header char -` was saved and
loaded from the preferences.
But was overwritten when the theme was loaded. If the theme didn't set
these values the value was just cleared. Despite that it might have been
set in the users preferences.
Funny enough the themes don't operate generally like this.
For example `otr.char` is not cleared.
This is again due to our borked theme/prefs concept
(https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1077).
For now let's just use the one set from the preferences if it's set. The
theme will however overwrite it if it is set there.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1244
So far we removed the avatar feature only after a succesful retrive in
avatar_request_item_by_id() before we are going to retrieve the actual
image.
We should remove it at every `/avatar barejid` call too so in case one
retrieval was unsucessful that we can call it again.
So far it seems like there is no other way to trigger getting the nodes
except announcing that we support the avatar feature.
So far we printed one after the last received message, which doesn't
make much sense of course.
Now only print one if there is not already one present.
This is because the actual command that parses itself (cmd_logging) returns false if it didn't get the expected parameters.
Handing the printing however is done by another function. This function is added to the Command struct as setting_function.
So if this is set, and the actual command returns false. We should just call the setting_function and not print the error message.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1237
The last 3 commits added basic support.
Thanks @aaptel!
This commit adds basic settings interface to use it.
See `/color on|off`.
We still have to enable settings for color blindness.
And maybe another setting to decide whether to color the
occupantslist/roster with the same algo.
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1191
* add theme_hash_attrs()
* when printing a user message check PREF_COLOR_NICK to decide whether
to colorize it or not
ideally we should hash the jid instead of the nick but this is already
a first step.
* add the HSL values of each of the 256 terminal colors
* add color_pair_cache_hash_str()
* move common code to _color_pair_cache_get() helper func
after hashing a string to a color, return the closest matching
terminal color using euclidian distance of the HSL diff vector (this
method was found empirically and seems to work well enough...)
From @xaizek s comment on issue #1235:
```
If the move would cause the window to be off the screen, it is an error and the window
is not moved.
Resize on the other hand doesn't fail like this according to its documentation. So new size needs to be applied first.
```
Big thanks to @xaizek for taking a look at our code and helping us!!
Regards https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1235
This is encountered when biboumi is used.
Example: `/join #debian-next%irc.oftc.net@biboumi.lebihan.pl`
It seems then time can be null.
g_date_time_format() will not work in this case although time_pref will
not be "off". So let's not call g_date_time_format() in this case. But
treat it like time is set to off.
However message reflection will not work properly with biboumi.
Probably we dont get origin-id.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1230
https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1190 had another issue:
Sometimes servers send multiple </delay> and we just checked the first
one we got and only used it if the 'from' attribute was fitting.
However it could be that we actually wanted the second </delay> element
and there the 'from' would have been right.
So we need to loop through them until we get the one with the fitting
'from'.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1190
Gajim sends \u200E and \u200F for RTL.
It is planned that Gajim stops doing this and uses some GTK feature to
get the same result.
However users expressed the whish that we filter out such characters in
incoming messages before displaying them to make Profanity more robust.
I'm still not sure whether I like the solution because it means a lot of
allocating/deallocating upon every new message.
Fix https://github.com/profanity-im/profanity/issues/1220
