0
0
mirror of https://github.com/netwide-assembler/nasm.git synced 2025-09-22 10:43:39 -04:00
Files
nasm/test/zero_displacement.asm
Victor van den Elzen ac732cb6a5 Improve process_ea and introduce -OL
Two fixes:
1. Optimization of [bx+0xFFFF] etc
   0xFFFF is an sbyte under 16-bit semantics,
   so make sure to check it right.

2. Don't optimize displacements in -O0
   Displacements that fit into an sbyte or
   can be removed should *not* be optimized in -O0.

   Implicit zero displacements are still optimized, e.g.:
   [eax] -> 0 bit displacement, [ebp] -> 8 bit displacement.
   However explicit displacements are not optimized:
   [eax+0] -> 32 bit displacement, [ebp+0] -> 32 bit displacement.

Because #2 breaks compatibility with 0.98,
I introduced a new optimization level: -OL, legacy.
2010-07-24 22:00:12 +02:00

38 lines
738 B
NASM

;Testname=O0; Arguments=-O0 -fbin -ozero_displacement.bin; Files=stdout stderr zero_displacement.bin
;Testname=OL; Arguments=-OL -fbin -ozero_displacement.bin; Files=stdout stderr zero_displacement.bin
;Testname=O1; Arguments=-O1 -fbin -ozero_displacement.bin; Files=stdout stderr zero_displacement.bin
;Testname=Ox; Arguments=-Ox -fbin -ozero_displacement.bin; Files=stdout stderr zero_displacement.bin
bits 16
mov ax, [bx]
mov ax, [bx+0]
mov ax, [bx+di]
mov ax, [bx+di+0]
mov ax, [bp]
mov ax, [bp+0]
bits 32
mov eax, [eax]
mov eax, [eax+0]
mov eax, [eax+ebx]
mov eax, [eax+ebx+0]
mov eax, [ebp]
mov eax, [ebp+0]
bits 64
mov eax, [rax]
mov eax, [rax+0]
mov eax, [rax+rbx]
mov eax, [rax+rbx+0]
mov eax, [rbp]
mov eax, [rbp+0]